I agree, and as I've said before, if people want to explore those
paths on their own, that's their choice, as long as they abide by the
constraints of the ASF.
- Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Carrico [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Already some forks of Lucene.Net going on
Pretty sure the lucene.net still has support in the community. I don't
think it's an either or kind of thing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Already some forks of Lucene.Net going on
I don't know if I like these forks. They may be able to get a nice .NET
version for the current Lucene version but it will be even harder than the
line by line port to keep up with changes in Java Lucene.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:45, Simone Chiaretta
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Searching on codeplex doesn't seem like there are project called "Lucene":
>
>
>
http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Lucene&sortBy=Relevance&licenses=|
&ac=3<http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Lucene&sortBy=Relevance&lice
nses=%7C&ac=3>
>
> <
>
http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Lucene&sortBy=Relevance&licenses=|
&ac=3<http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Lucene&sortBy=Relevance&lice
nses=%7C&ac=3>
> >there
> is Luce*R*e if that's what you are referring to
>
> Simone
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:27 AM, George Aroush <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for letting us know. If that project takes off and proves
itself,
> > that's great. There would not be a need for Lucene.Net.
> >
> > It seems to me the project over at codeplex.com is being called "Lucene"
> > --
> > IANAL, but I don't believe they can do so (or even use "Lucene.Net").
> > Someone need to check and advice the team.
> >
> > -- George
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 4:27 AM
> > To: lucene-net-user
> > Subject: Already some forks of Lucene.Net going on
> >
> > Seems like a few forks of Lucene.Net already started, with the intent to
> > make a full .NET version of Lucene.
> >
> > http://aimee.codeplex.com/
> > <http://aimee.codeplex.com/>http://lucere.codeplex.com/
> >
> > <http://lucere.codeplex.com/>This shows that having a real .NET API is
> > something that developers care about.
> >
> > Simone
> >
> > --
> > Simone Chiaretta
> > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> > twitter: @simonech
> >
> > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
> > "Life is short, play hard"
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Simone Chiaretta
> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> twitter: @simonech
>
> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
> "Life is short, play hard"
>
