Searching on codeplex doesn't seem like there are project called "Lucene":
http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Lucene&sortBy=Relevance&licenses=|&ac=3 <http://www.codeplex.com/site/search?query=Lucene&sortBy=Relevance&licenses=|&ac=3>there is Luce*R*e if that's what you are referring to Simone On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:27 AM, George Aroush <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for letting us know. If that project takes off and proves itself, > that's great. There would not be a need for Lucene.Net. > > It seems to me the project over at codeplex.com is being called "Lucene" > -- > IANAL, but I don't believe they can do so (or even use "Lucene.Net"). > Someone need to check and advice the team. > > -- George > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 4:27 AM > To: lucene-net-user > Subject: Already some forks of Lucene.Net going on > > Seems like a few forks of Lucene.Net already started, with the intent to > make a full .NET version of Lucene. > > http://aimee.codeplex.com/ > <http://aimee.codeplex.com/>http://lucere.codeplex.com/ > > <http://lucere.codeplex.com/>This shows that having a real .NET API is > something that developers care about. > > Simone > > -- > Simone Chiaretta > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber > twitter: @simonech > > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > "Life is short, play hard" > > -- Simone Chiaretta Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber twitter: @simonech Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic "Life is short, play hard"
