But I don't need anything that Limo or Luke is doing, if all my fields are stored in the index (isStored() will be true for all fields). right?

Praveen
----- Original Message ----- From: "Luke Francl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: partial updating of lucene



On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 09:00, Erik Hatcher wrote:

Have a look at the tool Luke (Google for "luke lucene" :) and see how
it does its "Reconstruct and Edit" facility.  It is possible, though
potentially lossy, to reconstruct a document and add it again.

Or look at LIMO's implementation of that feature, which to my eyes is a little easier to read (of course that's probably because I wrote it... ;):

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/limo/limo/src/net/sourceforge/limo/LimoUtils.java?rev=1.6&view=markup

(check out LimoUtils.reconstructDocument())

However, if you're doing analysis on your text to remove stopwords and
stuff like that, this WILL be lossy. I consider it more of an aid for
debugging than a way to re-index documents, though I suppose it would
work for that as well. However, I believe the process would be highly
resource intensive so I wouldn't recommend it.

The better solution is to add a stored keyword field that stores the
location of your document, and then re-index it from the source.

Regards,
Luke Francl


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to