I realize that under most circumstances, it would probably be more code to use it than just constructing a TermQuery, but having it would regularize query handling, and simplify new users' experience. And for the purposes of the PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper, it could be helpful.
Steve
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Kelvin - I respectfully disagree - could you elaborate on why this is not an appropriate use of Field.Keyword?
If the category is "How To", Field.Text would split this (depending on the Analyzer) into "how" and "to".
If the user is selecting a category from a drop-down, though, you shouldn't be using QueryParser on it, but instead aggregating a TermQuery("category", "How To") into a BooleanQuery with the rest of it. The rest may be other API created clauses and likely a piece from QueryParser.
Erik
On Feb 8, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Kelvin Tan wrote:
As I posted previously, Field.Keyword is appropriate in only certain situations. For your use-case, I believe Field.Text is more suitable.
k
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:02:19 -0600, Mike Miller wrote:
This may or may not be correct, but I am indexing it as a keyword because I provide a (required) radio button on the add screen for the user to determine which category the document should be assigned. Then in the search, provide a dropdown that can be used in the advanced search so that they can search only for a specific category of documents (like HowTo, Troubleshooting, etc).
-----Original Message----- From: Kelvin Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 9:32 AM To: Lucene Users List Subject: RE: Problem searching Field.Keyword field
Mike, is there a reason why you're indexing "category" as keyword not text?
k
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:26:13 -0600, Mike Miller wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
Sorry for my lack of understanding, but I am learning! Won't the query parser still handle this query? My limited understanding was that the search call provides the 'all' field as default field for query terms in the case where fields aren't specified. Using the current code, searches like author:Mike" and title:Lucene work fine.
-----Original Message-----
From: Miles Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:08 AM To: Lucene Users List Subject:
Re: Problem searching Field.Keyword field
You're using the query parser with the standard analyser. You should construct a term query manually instead.
-- Miles Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Runtime Collective Ltd.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
