I don't know why I'm even bothering with you. The FOSS movement is such that anyone can create a fork of openSUSE if they go closed-source.
The link I posted was to show you that openSUSE is actually a community effort despite your claims to the contrary. Naturally, Novell's sponsorship of the project & the fact that most of the core developers work for SuSE GmbH which is owned by Novell Inc, means that there is as much a tie-in between Novell & SuSE as there is between RedHat & Fedora Core. To quote you: "Hate to say it but i told u so, http://techp.org/petition/show/1 I bet all you proponents of SUSE/NOVELL are now kicking yourself's." - no kicking that I can see. Also, what exactly did you "tell us so"??? "openSUSE is not a community project" - disproved above. "A good candidates for crippling a distro like suse could be the gnu C library and the GCC collection of tools possibly if linus sees the light now the linux kernel under GPL3 would mean the end of openSuse" - puh-leeze. Have you read the GPLv3? Do you even know why Linus doesn't want it for the kernel? The views of SuSE on this thread were mainly about its quality as a distro. My first response to you clearly differentiated between the supporters of SuSE & the supporters of Novell. If you want to attack SuSE as a Linux-based operating system then please do. Take politics elsewhere. I won't respond after this. People must be sick of this thread. END OF CAT-FIGHT. -- "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room" - The President (Dr. Strangelove)
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
