On Friday 24 November 2006 19:37, henry wrote: > perhaps a list moderator should be appointed to monitor acceptable > etiquette
Doubtful. At least I wouldn't volunteer for the job. Firstly because the volume of mail can overwhelm you. Secondly because the moderator may have strong personal opinions on some issues and can easily stifle free debate and discussion on a topic that does not please them. In general we rarely have issues that need a strong moderator's hand and I would say that the people I've observed on this list are quite rational. But even rational people lose it once in a while especially over things they are very passionate about. But being able to accept one's mistake and apologise is enough. On this point, I believe that Colin's apology should let us consider this particular point to be moot. --- "What you don't recognize, you do not celebrate. What you do not celebrate, you do not reward. What you do not reward exits your life." The Law of Recognition- Mike Murdock _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
