>> In an attempt to be more practical, I have a few unanswered >> questions: >> >> If there is something i missed in some posting, please inform me, as >> mail to read these days can be too much ;) >> >> o CFI has invested quite a lot in running and operating the ccTLD If >> this function is to be rotated, i would need some kind of >> compensation for my investments if i were CFI. We're talking >> training, coders' salaries, equipment, intellectual property, >> etcetera. Who will take care of this? (I theoretically see it as a >> 'buyout' or 'takeover', and a legal battle may potentially arise) > > In no way have i suggested that CFI be replaced. i have repeatedly > said that they do a good technical job however i did suggest that > maybe we get them to handle over one second level domain maybe like > .or.ug to another party this is good for the market.
According to the same ICP-1 and RFC1591, this decision is entirely made by the current ccTLD manager. They may decide or not to relinquish control of the sub-domains. So, i guess the easy way out is to talk to them nicely, not forming policies that we shall impose on CFI ? :-) Rgds, Ernest. _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
