On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:52 +0200, Ernest Byaruhanga (AfriNIC) wrote: > please read icann's ICP-1 and rfc1591 > > at the moment, the decision entirely relies on CFI, to let another entity > manage the sub-domains. > > the way policy works, if we want this to change, we must first propose a > modification to the ICP-1 policy procedures. > > http://www.icann.org/icp/icp-1.htm
Ernest, believe you me, I dont think we are at Gunpoint currently. South Africa had such a problem some time back which was resolved. So much as the policy may seem to show that we are at the mercy of CFI, I think the reverse is true practically. Wire > > ta > eb > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
