Last I remember, benchmarks showed Reiserfs was fastest for reading small files. If you simply want to increase performance with either fs, here is an old Ubuntu Article
http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-increase-ext3-and-reiserfs-filesystems-performance.html On 10/2/07, Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > What do folks think about reiser file system in comparison to ext3. > The original developer, Mr. Hans Reiser is in jail awaiting conviction > for the murder of his wife, and he had already abandoned reiser3 to work > on reiser4 which I believe has failed to make it to the linux kernel to > date. > Novell no longer have it as the default fs on SuSE. Red Hat Enterprise > and CentOS do not even support it. > Is reiser dead? > > - -- > Hari > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHApr2qKk6z8PUzckRAi6JAJ9Vs4LZH4COykdtbthltqJVEQ9wpgCfWT8C > e/7pqa18oycxtP4rdYkPF+Y= > =014m > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
