On Monday 08 October 2007 19:27, Ernest - (AfriNIC) wrote: > The two gadgets run the same OS, have similar size and > nearly the same weight.
Not quite; the iPhone is slightly chunkier than the iPod touch, but nothing that will "break the deal". > The hardware is nearly identical, > with the ipod probably missing the phone component. As well as the fact that the iPod touch sports a 16GB flash drive, while the iPhone will only show 8GB. I'm normally patient with "new" hardware (still waiting for that PS-3 to settle into a smooth rhythm). I like the iPhone, but I still think it can do a lot better in about a year or so. For now, the wi-fi on the iPod touch and the 16GB worth of space is good enough for me :-). Mark.
pgpjXRyNt3bQX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
