/me agrees with Mark on the iPod touch But then again 16GB of flash memory... nah. 8GB should be fine... more movies, less battery life.
Sekidde On 10/8/07, Mark Tinka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 08 October 2007 19:27, Ernest - (AfriNIC) wrote: > > > The two gadgets run the same OS, have similar size and > > nearly the same weight. > > Not quite; the iPhone is slightly chunkier than the iPod > touch, but nothing that will "break the deal". > > > The hardware is nearly identical, > > with the ipod probably missing the phone component. > > As well as the fact that the iPod touch sports a 16GB flash > drive, while the iPhone will only show 8GB. > > I'm normally patient with "new" hardware (still waiting for > that PS-3 to settle into a smooth rhythm). I like the > iPhone, but I still think it can do a lot better in about a > year or so. > > For now, the wi-fi on the iPod touch and the 16GB worth of > space is good enough for me :-). > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
