Er, sorry, $700 for 1MB/mo.

Kyle Spencer wrote:
I've been quoted $700 for 1MB/s by Infocom. It wasn't handed to me on paper, but came directly from their sales department over the phone.

Reinier Battenberg wrote:
I have one testimony from someone claims 512kbps for 300USD on a private account on infocom.

That must be shared, as 1MB on SEACOM goes for 629 in SA:

http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Telecoms/9030.html (halfway down)

(I can not find pricing on the SEACOM website: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu%3Alg%3Aunofficial&q=site%3Aseacom.mu+USD&aq=f&oq=&aqi= )

We also have a testimony from someone on the i-network list saying he was offered 700USD for 1MB/s, if he paid for his own fiber. This was by KDN directly.

What I am wondering, is if the other Telco's have been negotiating a better deal with the satelite owners, and will also offer (slightly) better prices.

Did anyone get a nice quote from his ISP? Or are they just reaping the profits? (Or worse, are they not doing anything)

We should benefit, basically, SEACOM is cheaper, about 4 times. So common ISPs, where is that benefit?

rgds,

Reinier Battenberg
Director
Mountbatten Ltd.
+256 782 801 749
www.mountbatten.net

Be a professional website builder: www.easysites.ug


On Thursday 06 August 2009 13:05:09 herb wadulo wrote:
Mmmm when we see the end user pricing.......

Herb

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Peter Lubambula <[email protected]> wrote:
Hmm... I believe a switchover happened over the weekend. Fingers still
crossed

mail:~ # ping 87.248.113.14
PING 87.248.113.14 (87.248.113.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 87.248.113.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=4235 ms
64 bytes from 87.248.113.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=3591 ms
64 bytes from 87.248.113.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=3440 ms
64 bytes from 87.248.113.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=3247 ms

--- 87.248.113.14 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 4 received, 42% packet loss, time 6016ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3247.300/3628.894/4235.820/371.055 ms, pipe 5

On 7/22/09, Markus A. Wipfler <[email protected]> wrote:
uganda#ping 87.248.113.14 re 10

 Type escape sequence to abort.
 Sending 10, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 87.248.113.14, timeout is 2
seconds: !!!!!!!!!!
 Success rate is 100 percent (10/10), round-trip min/avg/max =
201/201/202

ms


 --
 Markus


 PS: This is highly unofficial so don't get too excited, but we are
basically there.












_______________________________________________
 LUG mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
 %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

 The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
(including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for
them in any
way.

 ---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any
way. ---------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------


--
Kyle Spencer,
Information Technology Manager,
International Medical Group


--
Kyle Spencer,
Information Technology Manager,
International Medical Group


_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to