As far as I'm aware, the TEAMS link will be 1.2 terabits/sec with
120Gbit/s available at launch.
The original 40Gbit/s w/ 622ish available for upgrade was determined to
be way too low.
IMHO, $100/Mbit/mo is not unrealistic, just unlikely given that it would
be a smart, people oriented business move.
Also, is everyone aware that KDN owns 10% of TEAMS? I wonder how much
they're going to want to cut into their own profits.
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday 14 August 2009 02:39:25 pm Samuel Gitta wrote:
http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Company%20Industry/-/5
39550/639386/-/view/printVersion/-/k2iflnz/-/index.html
I'm concerned the capacity available on the TEAMS system is
insufficient, and that upgrading it may lead to some
interesting circumstances.
One of the interviewees in this article alludes to
US$100/Mbps/month including onward charges - very
unrealistic, and this is not yet adding the IP charges.
Mark.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
--
Kyle Spencer,
Information Technology Manager,
International Medical Group
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
