Hi Rocco, good one.
Thing is, i could start changing now, then i have to wait 24 hours and pray everyone has visited, then make the change (during the day, or wait until saturday night?) Or I start the change tonight, and then i have missed some ISPs? Between a rock and a hard place. (started on implementing this on the 100 domains we defined though on a link that is slower than dialup today) -- rgds, Reinier Battenberg Director Mountbatten Ltd. +256 758 801 749 www.mountbatten.net On Friday 09 April 2010 13:04:53 IT-Doc24 Ltd. - Rocco Radisch wrote: > Yes, I can even approve that from my own experiences with UTL dns > servers. But that is how its supposed to work and it does usually > outside of UG. > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;mountbattenhosting.net. IN NS > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > mountbattenhosting.net. 7115 IN NS > nsusam1s.mountbattenhosting.net. > mountbattenhosting.net. 7115 IN NS > nsugam1m.mountbattenhosting.net. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > nsugam1m.mountbattenhosting.net. 83748 IN A 41.220.5.16 > nsusam1s.mountbattenhosting.net. 83748 IN A 208.79.240.3 > > The NS records are on a 24hour TTL at moment which is the recommended > standard. > > Rgds, > Rocco > > On 09/04/2010 12:53, McTim wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:42 PM, IT-Doc24 Ltd. - Rocco Radisch > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For that we have the TTL (time to live) value in the DNS records. Lower > >> the TTL value to 300 (5 mins) of the respective record 24 hours before > >> the change then other DNS servers / caches / clients are instructed to > >> check back within the given time. After the change you can go back to > >> 24hours (86400). If ISPs have a fixed cache time out that would be > >> against the IETF. > > > > ISPs (and other network operators) everywhere including UG are non-RFC > > compliant in one way or another. > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > way. --------------------------------------- > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > -=-=-=-= Filtered-With-Copfilter: Version 0.84beta4 (ProxSMTP 1.8) > Copfilter-Filtered-With: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 > by Markus Madlener @ http://www.copfilter.org > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
