Patrick Okui wrote thus on 6/12/10 2:55 PM: > > On 12 Jun, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Mwirima Byaruhanga wrote: > >>>> cool! i wonder what the effect would be if facebook were >>>> v6-only reachable :) >>> >>> some very unhappy fb users. >> >> I'm thinking mobile operators would consider going v6 (so >> their uysers can access facebook). > > <rant> > > The fact that addresses are incompatible on the wire is in fact > my biggest gripe with v6. One can't just deploy a single stack v6 > only network without then toying with some form of NAT. It > shouldn't have mattered that someone with a v6 only address will > try to reach someone with a v4 only address. > > </rant> > > Anyhow, spilt milk and all that;
Exactly :-) > I'd better get back to deploying > my v6 space. While you are at it - start pushing for v6-peering @ the IXP. eb _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
