On Saturday 12 June 2010 06:55:10 pm Patrick Okui wrote: > The fact that addresses are incompatible on the wire is > in fact my biggest gripe with v6.
Unfortunately, there's no sane way to fit 128 bits of v6 addressing into 32 bits of v4 :-(. > One can't just deploy > a single stack v6 only network without then toying with > some form of NAT. Looks like there's no other way we shall deal with the inter-working requirements between v4 and v6 for the foreseeable future. Any kind of translation between both protocols will involve some form of NAT. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
