and much cheaper than doing that very same thing for facebook. (+ it would 
spur local webdevelopers, which will create a nice resource pool to hire from 
in the long run. Did i mention mobile-money+web integration? )

-- 
rgds,

Reinier Battenberg
Director
Mountbatten Ltd.
+256 758 801 749
www.mountbatten.net



On Friday 13 August 2010 15:06:19 Okalany Daniel wrote:
> This should help highlight the relevance of the IXP. Hoping more ISP will
> have unmetered bandwidth to local sites (Sites connected to the IXP).
> 
> ++i;
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinier Battenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 2:41 PM
> To: Linux Users Group Uganda
> Subject: Re: [LUG] Google Global Cache
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> if there is a problem with the UIXP, fix it.
> 
> 
> 
> +1 to badru
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> rgds,
> 
> 
> 
> Reinier Battenberg
> 
> Director
> 
> Mountbatten Ltd.
> 
> +256 758 801 749
> 
>  <http://www.mountbatten.net> www.mountbatten.net
> 
> On Friday 13 August 2010 14:21:14 McTim wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:27 PM,  < <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On the GCC I think google made some mistakes in uganda.  The two
> > > 
> > > organisations that have the GCC do not seem to understand what
> > > 
> > > sharing means. The MTN deal however I understand was under a
> > > 
> > > separate arrangement.  However on the UTL arrangement I have heard
> > > 
> > > it clearly from UTL that to them the UIXP is not fit to be the home
> > > 
> > > of the GCC nor a point for others to connect to the GCC. They would
> > > 
> > > expect anyone who connects to have a private link that goes to
> > > 
> > > telephone house.  So Mike if you do that you are setting a bad
> > > 
> > > precedence.  We need to insist on meeting at the IX. I do not care
> > > 
> > > where the physical server is located but the open access model that
> > > 
> > > google want should be respected by whoever hosts the server.
> > 
> > +1 to what Badru says.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> LUG mailing list
> 
>  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
> 
>  <http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> 
> 
> 
> LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM  <http://www.infocom.co.ug/>
> http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> 
> 
> 
> All Archives can be found at 
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> 
> 
> 
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any
> way.
> 
> ---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to