Thanks for this suggestion. First, I should point out that full sources are available for every one of our production and beta Lustre releases through our download site.
And we appreciate these releases a lot :) Another method might also be nightly snapshots of the source tree, at least for the interim.
I understand that external engineers can benefit from having access to the scm as well, and external read-only access is available to support customers upon request. If you are a support customer, and you are interested in this service, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be sure to send an email. However, its been mentioned several times to me that these emails have been ignored/lost somewhere along the way. I'll send another one.
Further, as I explained at the Lustre.org meeting at SC'06, we have been contemplating a move to subversion and moving our entire source code repository to the outside. But, since we have some non-GPL libraries and sources in our tree related to other projects, this is not a trivial transition for us. I can't make any firm commitments on a date at this time.
Sorry, wasn't at SC'06 :( ... and I'm glad you are trying to move to a better scm than cvs. Also I wish you luck on getting the non-GPL'ed code out of the repository. Can we get an update on which libraries in the repository aren't GPL and what their status towards removal are? - David Brown _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
