On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:47:02PM -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > > > Further, as I explained at the Lustre.org meeting at SC'06, we have > > been contemplating a move to subversion and moving our entire source > > code repository to the outside. But, since we have some non-GPL > > libraries and sources in our tree related to other projects, this is > > not a trivial transition for us. I can't make any firm commitments on > > a date at this time. > > I would like to put in a suggestion for Mercurial instead of SVN. This > also might make for an easier transition since it looks like the FreeBSD > guys made a CVS to Mercurial mirror program they are using to mirror the > FreeBSD CVS. > > http://hg.fr.freebsd.org/ > > Maybe one of the paying customers could look at setting this up... >
perhaps the transition to `git' might be more suited to lustre, since the linux kernel devs are using it, and there are various patches to the kernel anyway and most who have played around with the newer developmental kernels and other patches for things like openib are probably using git as well, it seems like a natural choice. Jimmy. -- Jimmy Tang Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/ | http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/~jtang _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
