On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:05:43PM -0400, Peter Bojanic wrote: > Hi David and Troy, > > On 2007-02-15, at 23:30 , Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:46:16AM -0800, David Brown wrote: > >>I was wondering if there's any anonymous cvs access out there? > >>The wiki says a few things but they are very out of date or don't > >>work at > >>all. > > > >I was wondering pretty much the same thing.. Getting Lustre out > >into the > >open source community would be something that a lot of Clusterfs's > >paying customers would like. I know DOE for one has mandates to > >support > >open source projects. > > Thanks for this suggestion. First, I should point out that full > sources are available for every one of our production and beta Lustre > releases through our download site. > > I understand that external engineers can benefit from having access > to the scm as well, and external read-only access is available to > support customers upon request. If you are a support customer, and > you are interested in this service, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Further, as I explained at the Lustre.org meeting at SC'06, we have > been contemplating a move to subversion and moving our entire source > code repository to the outside. But, since we have some non-GPL > libraries and sources in our tree related to other projects, this is > not a trivial transition for us. I can't make any firm commitments on > a date at this time.
I would like to put in a suggestion for Mercurial instead of SVN. This also might make for an easier transition since it looks like the FreeBSD guys made a CVS to Mercurial mirror program they are using to mirror the FreeBSD CVS. http://hg.fr.freebsd.org/ Maybe one of the paying customers could look at setting this up... _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
