On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:50 +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
>> Hi again :)
>>
>> Lustre 1.6.2 on amd64, 2.6.18 kernel.
>>
>> We seem to be unable to set lustre quotas larger than 4TB. Somewhere
>> along the way the value seems to be truncated to 32bits. A quick gdb
>> session of an lfs binary with debug info shows the quota struct being
>> filled in correctly, so it seems to be something in the bowels of
>> lustre somewhere...
>
> This is being worked upon in bug 13904.
"You are not authorized to access bug #13904."
Would it be too much to ask that issues are filed in public bugs once
identified in private bugs?
As I've said before on the mailing list: The bugs themselves should
never need to be private, however some customer test cases might need
to be.
In any case, I'm assuming this isn't fixed in 1.6.3 then. Any ETA?
Lustre 1.6.3.1? :)
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not a dictator. It's just I have a grumpy face.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
