Oops, wrong thread, ignore.
Sorry for that.

Philippe 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernadat, Philippe 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:43 PM
> To: Niklas Edmundsson; Kalpak Shah
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Lustre-discuss] Can't set quota larger than 4TB
> 
> You can proceed, 15 and 16 are down
> 
> Philippe 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > Niklas Edmundsson
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:30 PM
> > To: Kalpak Shah
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Can't set quota larger than 4TB
> > 
> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:50 +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> > >> Hi again :)
> > >>
> > >> Lustre 1.6.2 on amd64, 2.6.18 kernel.
> > >>
> > >> We seem to be unable to set lustre quotas larger than 4TB. 
> > Somewhere
> > >> along the way the value seems to be truncated to 32bits. A 
> > quick gdb
> > >> session of an lfs binary with debug info shows the quota 
> > struct being
> > >> filled in correctly, so it seems to be something in the bowels of
> > >> lustre somewhere...
> > >
> > > This is being worked upon in bug 13904.
> > 
> > "You are not authorized to access bug #13904."
> > 
> > Would it be too much to ask that issues are filed in public 
> bugs once 
> > identified in private bugs?
> > 
> > As I've said before on the mailing list: The bugs themselves should 
> > never need to be private, however some customer test cases 
> might need 
> > to be.
> > 
> > In any case, I'm assuming this isn't fixed in 1.6.3 then. Any ETA? 
> > Lustre 1.6.3.1? :)
> > 
> > /Nikke
> > -- 
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >   Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se     |    
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> >   I am not a dictator.  It's just I have a grumpy face.
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lustre-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> > 

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to