You can proceed, 15 and 16 are down Philippe
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Niklas Edmundsson > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:30 PM > To: Kalpak Shah > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Can't set quota larger than 4TB > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Kalpak Shah wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:50 +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: > >> Hi again :) > >> > >> Lustre 1.6.2 on amd64, 2.6.18 kernel. > >> > >> We seem to be unable to set lustre quotas larger than 4TB. > Somewhere > >> along the way the value seems to be truncated to 32bits. A > quick gdb > >> session of an lfs binary with debug info shows the quota > struct being > >> filled in correctly, so it seems to be something in the bowels of > >> lustre somewhere... > > > > This is being worked upon in bug 13904. > > "You are not authorized to access bug #13904." > > Would it be too much to ask that issues are filed in public bugs once > identified in private bugs? > > As I've said before on the mailing list: The bugs themselves should > never need to be private, however some customer test cases might need > to be. > > In any case, I'm assuming this isn't fixed in 1.6.3 then. Any ETA? > Lustre 1.6.3.1? :) > > /Nikke > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > -=-=-=-=-=-=- > Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > I am not a dictator. It's just I have a grumpy face. > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > =-=-=-=-=-=-= > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
