It is very difficult to find relevant documentation for heartbeat 1/2. I just finished configuring a heartbeat system and would not recommend it because of the documentation. (They seem to have removed portions the heartbeat documentation from the site.)
Pacemaker is not a simple solution to configure either. I played briefly with the RH clustering software. It does not directly support any FS type other than the basic ext2/ext3, and wasn't happy with a lustre type. -- Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org [mailto:lustre-discuss- > boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Santana > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:42 AM > To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > Subject: [Lustre-discuss] failover software - heartbeat > > Howdy, > > The lustre manual recommends heartbeat for handling failover. The > pacemaker is successor of hearbeat version 2. So whats recommended - > should we be using pacemaker or stick to hearbeat? > > - > CS. > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
