Jim Garlick wrote: > Hi, > > OK I have posted it to https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20165 > > 20165: scripts for heartbeat v1 integration > > I added example config files from our test cluster. Probably best to > redirect questions/comments/criticisms to the bug and I'll respond there.
Looks very good, thanks bunches. I've added a few extras from the discussion. Did you guy try ipfail, or only pingd? cliffw > > Jim > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:26:24PM +1000, Atul Vidwansa wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> It would be great if you can attach the scripts to a Lustre bugzilla bug. >> >> Cheers, >> _Atul >> >> Jim Garlick wrote: >>> We recently put heartbeat v1 in production and along the way >>> developed some admin scripts including heartbeat resource agent compliant >>> lustre init scripts, a script to initiate failover/failback and get >>> detailed >>> status, a powerman stonith interface, and various safeguards to ensure MMP >>> is on, devices are present and usable, etc. before starting lustre. >>> >>> If this is of general interest I could post it to a bug for review. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 01:45:02PM -0600, Lundgren, Andrew wrote: >>> >>>> It is very difficult to find relevant documentation for heartbeat 1/2. I >>>> just finished configuring a heartbeat system and would not recommend it >>>> because of the documentation. (They seem to have removed portions the >>>> heartbeat documentation from the site.) >>>> Pacemaker is not a simple solution to configure either. I played briefly >>>> with the RH clustering software. It does not directly support any FS >>>> type other than the basic ext2/ext3, and wasn't happy with a lustre type. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org [mailto:lustre-discuss- >>>>> boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Santana >>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:42 AM >>>>> To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>>>> Subject: [Lustre-discuss] failover software - heartbeat >>>>> >>>>> Howdy, >>>>> >>>>> The lustre manual recommends heartbeat for handling failover. The >>>>> pacemaker is successor of hearbeat version 2. So whats recommended - >>>>> should we be using pacemaker or stick to hearbeat? >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> CS. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>>>> http://**lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>>> http://**lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >>> http://*lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>> >> >> -- >> ================================== >> Atul Vidwansa >> Sun Microsystems Australia Pty Ltd >> Web: http://*blogs.sun.com/atulvid >> Email: atul.vidwa...@sun.com >> > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss