I tried the pingd in v2, and was unable to get it working. (I also tried it in pacemaker and ended up opening a ticket that we haven't finished working though yet.)
The fiber ping is only around as a v1 tool as far as I can tell. Since I wasn't able to get normal ping to function, I never even tried the FC stuff. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Garlick [mailto:garl...@llnl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 12:39 PM > To: Cliff White > Cc: Atul Vidwansa; Lundgren, Andrew; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] failover software - heartbeat > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:37:54AM -0700, Cliff White wrote: > > Jim Garlick wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >OK I have posted it to > https://*bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20165 > > > > > > 20165: scripts for heartbeat v1 integration > > > > > >I added example config files from our test cluster. Probably best > to > > >redirect questions/comments/criticisms to the bug and I'll respond > there. > > > > Looks very good, thanks bunches. I've added a few extras from the > > discussion. Did you guy try ipfail, or only pingd? > > cliffw > > We tried ipfail (unsuccessfully), not pingd. > I think pingd is a v2 only feature? Our work is entirely with v1, > which seemed adeqate and also much simpler to understand and get right. > > > >Jim > > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:26:24PM +1000, Atul Vidwansa wrote: > > >>Hi Jim, > > >> > > >>It would be great if you can attach the scripts to a Lustre > bugzilla bug. > > >> > > >>Cheers, > > >>_Atul > > >> > > >>Jim Garlick wrote: > > >>>We recently put heartbeat v1 in production and along the way > > >>>developed some admin scripts including heartbeat resource agent > compliant > > >>>lustre init scripts, a script to initiate failover/failback and > get > > >>>detailed > > >>>status, a powerman stonith interface, and various safeguards to > ensure > > >>>MMP > > >>>is on, devices are present and usable, etc. before starting > lustre. > > >>> > > >>>If this is of general interest I could post it to a bug for > review. > > >>> > > >>>Jim > > >>> > > >>>On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 01:45:02PM -0600, Lundgren, Andrew wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>It is very difficult to find relevant documentation for heartbeat > 1/2. > > >>>>I just finished configuring a heartbeat system and would not > recommend > > >>>>it because of the documentation. (They seem to have removed > portions > > >>>>the heartbeat documentation from the site.) > > >>>>Pacemaker is not a simple solution to configure either. I played > > >>>>briefly with the RH clustering software. It does not directly > support > > >>>>any FS type other than the basic ext2/ext3, and wasn't happy with > a > > >>>>lustre type. > > >>>>-- > > >>>>Andrew > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>>>From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org [mailto:lustre- > discuss- > > >>>>>boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Santana > > >>>>>Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:42 AM > > >>>>>To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > >>>>>Subject: [Lustre-discuss] failover software - heartbeat > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Howdy, > > >>>>> > > >>>>>The lustre manual recommends heartbeat for handling failover. > The > > >>>>>pacemaker is successor of hearbeat version 2. So whats > recommended - > > >>>>>should we be using pacemaker or stick to hearbeat? > > >>>>> > > >>>>>- > > >>>>>CS. > > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>>>Lustre-discuss mailing list > > >>>>>Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > >>>>>http://***lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > >>>>> > > >>>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>>Lustre-discuss mailing list > > >>>>Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > >>>>http://***lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > >>>> > > >>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>Lustre-discuss mailing list > > >>>Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > >>>http://**lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > >>> > > >> > > >>-- > > >>================================== > > >>Atul Vidwansa > > >>Sun Microsystems Australia Pty Ltd > > >>Web: http://**blogs.sun.com/atulvid > > >>Email: atul.vidwa...@sun.com > > >> > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Lustre-discuss mailing list > > >Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > >http://*lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss