Thanks.
Are you going to replace the 2.8 rpm sets in your repos, or just leave
them that way until 2.9? Yeah, that is a provocative question. It just
seems to me that it is such a fundamental thing, that a new rpm set
should be created for distribution.
bob
On 3/28/2016 4:20 PM, Glossman, Bob wrote:
Bob,
This is a known issue. A fix is already in flight, see LU-7887
https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7887.
In the short term this can be worked around by building your own from source.
It is strictly an issue of our build framework.
Doesn’t impact on manual builds at all.
Bob Glossman
HPDD Software Engineer
On 3/28/16, 1:11 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bob Ball"
<lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org on behalf of b...@umich.edu> wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that the lnetctl command is missing from this
rpm set? I mean, an entire chapter of the manual dedicated to this
command, and it is not present?
Will this be fixed?
bob
On 3/16/2016 6:13 PM, Jones, Peter A wrote:
We are pleased to announce that the Lustre 2.8.0 Release has been declared GA and is available for
<https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/>
download<https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/>
<https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/> . You can also grab the source from
<http://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git/commit/ea79df5af4d9b034e39caa396cefc2a075e572ba>
git<http://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git/commit/ea79df5af4d9b034e39caa396cefc2a075e572ba>
This major release includes new features:
Distributed Namespace (DNE) Asynchronous Commit of cross-MDT updates for improved
performance. Remote rename and remote hard link functionality. This completes the
work funded by OpenSFS to allow the usage of multiple metadata servers
(LU-3534<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3534>)
LFSCK Phase 4 Performance and efficiency improvements to the online filesystem
consistency checker. This completes this OpenSFS-funded work
(LU-6361<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6361>)
Red Hat 7.x Server Support This release offers support for both servers and clients
with RHEL 7.2 (LU-5022<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5022>)
SE Linux support for Lustre client Added the capability to enforce SE Linux security
policies for Lustre clients. This work was contributed by Atos.
(LU-5560<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5560>)
Multiple Metadata RPCs Support of multiple metadata modifications per client (in
last_rcvd file) to improve the multi-threaded metadata performance of a single
client. This work was contributed by Atos.
(LU-5319<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5319>)
Fuller details can be found in the 2.8 wiki page<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0> (including
the change log<http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_2.8.0_Changelog> and test
mat<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0#Test_Matrix>rix<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0#Test_Matrix>)
The following are known issues in the Lustre 2.8 Release:
LU-7404<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7404> – Running with ZFS 0.6.5 and
newer versions can result in client evictions while under load conditions. This is due to
an upstream ZFS issue<https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4210>
LU-7836<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7836> – Performing failover with
multiple MDTs per MDS can result in excessive memory consumption . It is recommended
to deploy with a single MDT per MDS until a fix is in place for this issue
Work is in progress for these issues.
Please log any issues found in the issue tracking
system<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/>
We would like to thank OpenSFS<http://www.opensfs.org/>, for their
contributions towards the cost of the release and also to all Lustre community
members who have contributed to the release with code, reviews or testing.
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
