Bob Can you check whether the build at https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-reviews/38084/ works as expected?
Peter On 3/28/16, 8:12 PM, "Drokin, Oleg" <[email protected]> wrote: >We are definitely not planning to replace the existing RPMs to avoid any >confusion. > >We are debating other ways of relieving the situation without waiting for >2.9 and we'll update the list once the fix is really ready. >Right now it has not even landed to master as you can see. > >On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Bob Ball wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> Are you going to replace the 2.8 rpm sets in your repos, or just leave >>them that way until 2.9? Yeah, that is a provocative question. It just >>seems to me that it is such a fundamental thing, that a new rpm set >>should be created for distribution. >> >> bob >> >> On 3/28/2016 4:20 PM, Glossman, Bob wrote: >>> Bob, >>> This is a known issue. A fix is already in flight, see LU-7887 >>>https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7887. >>> >>> In the short term this can be worked around by building your own from >>>source. >>> It is strictly an issue of our build framework. >>> Doesn¹t impact on manual builds at all. >>> >>> Bob Glossman >>> HPDD Software Engineer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/28/16, 1:11 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bob Ball" >>><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> Has anyone else noticed that the lnetctl command is missing from this >>>> rpm set? I mean, an entire chapter of the manual dedicated to this >>>> command, and it is not present? >>>> >>>> Will this be fixed? >>>> >>>> bob >>>> >>>> On 3/16/2016 6:13 PM, Jones, Peter A wrote: >>>>> We are pleased to announce that the Lustre 2.8.0 Release has been >>>>>declared GA and is available for >>>>><https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release >>>>>/> >>>>>download<https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/> >>>>> <https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/> . You >>>>>can also grab the source from >>>>><http://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git/commit/ea79df5af4d9b03 >>>>>4e39caa396cefc2a075e572ba> >>>>>git<http://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git/commit/ea79df5af4d9 >>>>>b034e39caa396cefc2a075e572ba> >>>>> >>>>> This major release includes new features: >>>>> >>>>> Distributed Namespace (DNE) Asynchronous Commit of cross-MDT updates >>>>>for improved performance. Remote rename and remote hard link >>>>>functionality. This completes the work funded by OpenSFS to allow the >>>>>usage of multiple metadata servers >>>>>(LU-3534<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3534>) >>>>> >>>>> LFSCK Phase 4 Performance and efficiency improvements to the online >>>>>filesystem consistency checker. This completes this OpenSFS-funded >>>>>work (LU-6361<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6361>) >>>>> Red Hat 7.x Server Support This release offers support for both >>>>>servers and clients with RHEL 7.2 >>>>>(LU-5022<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5022>) >>>>> >>>>> SE Linux support for Lustre client Added the capability to enforce >>>>>SE Linux security policies for Lustre clients. This work was >>>>>contributed by Atos. >>>>>(LU-5560<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5560>) >>>>> Multiple Metadata RPCs Support of multiple metadata modifications >>>>>per client (in last_rcvd file) to improve the multi-threaded metadata >>>>>performance of a single client. This work was contributed by Atos. >>>>>(LU-5319<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5319>) >>>>> Fuller details can be found in the 2.8 wiki >>>>>page<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0> (including the change >>>>>log<http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_2.8.0_Changelog> and test >>>>>mat<http://wiki.lustre.org/Release_2.8.0#Test_Matrix>rix<http://wiki.l >>>>>ustre.org/Release_2.8.0#Test_Matrix>) >>>>> The following are known issues in the Lustre 2.8 Release: >>>>> >>>>> LU-7404<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7404> Running with >>>>>ZFS 0.6.5 and newer versions can result in client evictions while >>>>>under load conditions. This is due to an upstream ZFS >>>>>issue<https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4210> >>>>> LU-7836<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7836> Performing >>>>>failover with multiple MDTs per MDS can result in excessive memory >>>>>consumption . It is recommended to deploy with a single MDT per MDS >>>>>until a fix is in place for this issue >>>>> Work is in progress for these issues. >>>>> >>>>> Please log any issues found in the issue tracking >>>>>system<https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/> >>>>> We would like to thank OpenSFS<http://www.opensfs.org/>, for their >>>>>contributions towards the cost of the release and also to all Lustre >>>>>community members who have contributed to the release with code, >>>>>reviews or testing. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lustre-discuss mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> lustre-discuss mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
