> My not-so-scholarly take:
> Good lutes were working tools and subject to the whims and clumsiness of 
> working musicians.  Paintings were valuable decoration to be preserved well 
> out of the way of trouble.


Seems like the owners would have been more careful than to have destroyed
_all_ of their lutes.  But I've never climbed onto a horse with a lute, so 
perhaps I should be more understanding.


Reply via email to