I think it would be a mistake to cite what are additions and corrections to 
Zuth's work as a demonstration that his work is poor.  (Some of that is really 
obscure information.) For his time, his Handbuch is quite thorough. And Matanya 
knows about the Bergier, Ungay,  entry because I told him about it. 

It stems from a mistake in the ca. 1890 card catalogue at what is now the 
Berlin Staatsbibliothek (the one on Unter den Linden).  The composer reference 
is on the large catalogue card for Mus Ms 40032, that immense Neapolitan lute 
book (viola de mano book!) now in Cracow. It is the title of a chanson by 
Crecquillon, not a person.  But it appears several times in difcerent versions 
in that manuscript, so the cataloguer thought it was a composer's name.  S/He 
didn't know it was the same piece done up with different divisions.

Ready reference materials were not known in those days.   That's why it is such 
a shame that Ophee published the Codice Lauten-Buch without taking a day or two 
to track down the composers and correct titles.  His edition ignores a century 
of musical scholarship. It's just another Chilesotti Rip-Off.  No better than 
the zillions before his.

There's another place in that same manuscript with the mistaken name. Several 
pieces in that manuscript have Van Gheligo in the margin.  One's a motet 
movement by Josquin. Is Van Gheligo some Dutch lutenist who made the 
intabulation?  No it's Italian for Gospel, "Vangelo."  It is one of the very 
few iindications that lute might be used during the Mass. Here when the 
celebrant walked to the lectern to read the Gospel of the day, the lutenist 
would play that Josquin motet intabulation.

ajn
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matanya Ophee 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:13 PM
  Subject: [LUTE] Re: [LUTE]Madame Robert Sidney Pratten, Victorian guitar 
virtuosa


  Arthur Ness
  Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:56:03 -0700

  >I didn't realize that in addition to being a music hall tenor he was 
  >a comedian
  >as well. He must have been tremendously popular. It is Zuth in his Handbuch
  >that says that Shand was an American. I wonder where he got that notion.

  Same place he got the spelling of Shand's teacher as Sidney-Pratten,
  and the name and that famous lutenist Bergier, Ungay. A most reliable
  reference book, uh?

  Actually if you want to know what Zuth's contemporaries thought of 
  his work you can look it up here:

  http://www.orphee.com/fryk.htm

  The text in red, BTW, are the annotations made to Fryklund's text by 
  Kenneth Sparr.


  Matanya Ophee
  Editions Orphe'e, Inc.,
  1240 Clubview Blvd. N.
  Columbus, OH 43235-1226
  Phone: 614-846-9517
  Fax:     614-846-9794
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.orphee.com
  http://www.livejournal.com/users/matanya/  




  To get on or off this list see list information at
  http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

--

Reply via email to