In einer eMail vom 24.10.2006 15:25:30 Westeurop=E4ische Normalzeit schreibt 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

> "operatic tenors" to me sounds like he's making a
> distinction between those who are trained to project
> their voices with the aid of their diaphragm - a
> brisk, penetrating, back-of-the-hall-reaching, royal
> shakespeare company voice - as opposed to someone
> speaking (singing) normally

So, I take it there is nothing between these extremes. I also don't like 
using the word "normal" it always sounds like a moral judgement.

The problem is for the non-specialist it sound like you have 2 alternatives 
Sting or Pavorotti. Good PR bad information.

best wishes
Mark

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to