I agree.  There is nothing "inauthentic" in Nigel's style.

ed

At 02:52 AM 7/18/2007 -0700, David Tayler wrote:
>There may be an undertow gluing me to my computer monitor... but I
>think one can only play
>   that well by using historical technique, which is what Nigel does
>so very well.
>He simply bases his style on original source material.
>dt
>
>At 02:37 PM 7/17/2007, you wrote:
> >It seems to me that a lot of the controversy over this set of recordings is
> >centered around how good Mr. North plays; which seems to imply that no one
> >can play this good using historical methods.  I know, no one has said that
> >specifically, but there seems to be an undertow to that effect; thumb out,
> >thumb in, moving the right hand up and down the length of the strings at the
> >rose, and a floating pinky.  Something to think about at the least.
> >
> >Vance Wood.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bruno Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" <[email protected]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:57 AM
> >Subject: [LUTE] Re: Nigel on YouTube
> >
> >
> > > David, what I meant by bending of the last joint is exactly what you 
> said.
> > > The finger does not remain bended but rather in a flexible state when in
> > > touch with the strings. In classical guitar it is maintained straight 
> when
> > > plucking, however, I've seen people bending it ocasionally.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/7/17, David Tayler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >>
> > >> I think it is interesting that when we actually hear someone playing
> > >> historically,  we wonder if it is.
> > >> As for bending the last joint of the finger, that is a tricky
> > >> question. If you grab and bend the last joint,
> > >> you often will make a scratchy sound; if the joint is flexible and
> > >> bends slightly backwards, yielding to the thread of pressure from the
> > >> finger, wrist, and arm, you can strike both strings with no fear of
> > >> the dreaded buzz.
> > >> That said, there are many ways to strike a string, or groups of strings.
> > >> Lotta reverb on that video :) beautiful playing.
> > >>
> > >> dt
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> At 09:26 AM 7/16/2007, you wrote:
> > >> >The question of nails just arose because I felt the sound was extremely
> > >> >focused, almost as if he was playing on a single string with nails.
> > >> >Also,
> > >> if
> > >> >you notice his right hand, the fingers are been used as in classical
> > >> guitar
> > >> >technique where you don't bend the last joint. That's how I started out
> > >> >playing, but soon as I cut the nails I had to bend the last joint to be
> > >> able
> > >> >to grab both strings together.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >2007/7/16, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Jul 16, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Andrew Gibbs wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Not that I'm in any position to be questioning Nigel North's
> > >> > > > technique but shouldn't these pieces be played thumb-under, little
> > >> > > > finger on the soundboard and with the right hand closer to the
> > >> bridge?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The little finger can still anchor the RH even though the hand
> > >> > > changes position, horizontally or vertically.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Conventional wisdom seems to have it that thumb-out is okay for
> > >> > > Dowland because he was most probably playing thumb-out towards the
> > >> > > end of the 16th century.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I noticed on those clips that NN's right hand thumb does slip behind
> > >> > > his fingers occasionally.  He seems to be playing with that kind of
> > >> > > hybrid technique that more or less leaves the fingers more or less
> > >> > > where they are for either thumb-out or thumb-under.  That method
> > >> > > doesn't require much change in RH position to bring the thumb over
> > >> > > the fingers instead of behind them.  In fact, as long as the 
> thumb is
> > >> > > busy playing bass notes the question of thumb under/out doesn't
> > >> > > arise.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We seem to have two different sets of iconography:  artists'
> > >> > > impressions in old paintings and modern-day photographic, as well as
> > >> > > actual visual, evidence.  Past and present iconographies don't 
> always
> > >> > > show the same thumb-out position.  Most lutenists I've seen in live
> > >> > > performance, in video's, in photo's accompanying CD notes or on
> > >> > > personal websites, play Baroque music with this hybrid 
> technique, and
> > >> > > not in the more severe style depicted in the old paintings.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Apparently thumb-under is not recommended for playing Baroque music,
> > >> > > but possibly might be acceptable if said Baroque music is played 
> on a
> > >> > > renaissance lute.  So is the Earl of Derby's Galliard renaissance or
> > >> > > Baroque?  I dunno, it's very confusing.  Does it really matter that
> > >> > > much...  ;-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > DR
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > To get on or off this list see list information at
> > >> > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >--
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/904 - Release Date: 7/16/2007
> > > 5:42 PM
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/906 - Release Date: 7/17/2007 
>6:30 PM



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice:  (218) 728-1202



Reply via email to