Excellent. Thank you. Eugene
At 10:04 AM 11/21/2007, Arthur Ness wrote: >Check the Productions d'Oz site. Search on Segal. > >http://www.productionsdoz.com/c215888.2.html > >There seems to be no fingerings. And the concerto for >two mandolins has a review that praises Peter's >scholarship with his use of original manuscript and >attention to details of articulation. >==AJN >Boston, Mass. >This week's free download from >Classical Music Library: >Mahler: Symphony No. 5 >Go to my web page: >http://mysite.verizon.net/arthurjness/ >For some free scores, go to: >http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/arthurjnesslutescores/ >----- Original Message ----- From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Arthur Ness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >"lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" <[email protected]>; "David >Tayler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:43 AM >Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Vivaldi > > >>At 09:58 AM 11/17/2007, Arthur Ness wrote: >>>There is another edition of these pieces (RV 540, 93, >>>425 and 532) by the late Peter Segal for Les >>>Productions >>>d'Oz in Canada (Ottawa?). I have not (yet) see them >>>in >>>their entirety. They have alternate parts for guitar, >>>but seem to be edited originally for lute and >>>mandolins. >> >>The question I would have is what type of mandolins? >>Did the editors impose their own fingerings, etc? The >>modern g-d'-a'-e'' Neapolitan type is quite a bit >>different from the [g]-b-e'-a'-d''-g'' lute-like >>thing Vivaldi almost certainly had in mind. >> >>Eugene >> > To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
