----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arthur Ness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lute Net" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] New piece of the month

| Dear Arthur,
|
| Thanks - I thought you might be interested!  I had not realised
it was
| in Mertel as well, and now I look at it and it raises another
| interesting question, because the Mertel text is practically
identical
| to Hirsch - where did they both (20 years apart and in
different
| countries) get this version?

Hello Martin,

<<ajn>>In working with early sources of lute music one must
realize that
literally tons of the stuff have been lost.  And surely some if
not much is lost without a trace.  We know about Petrucci's book
III (Gian Maria Allemani) because Ferdinando Columbus owned a
copy (destroyed in the Lisbon Earthquake) and the surviving
library
catalogue describes the volume.  Otherwise we would just know
that there
should be a book III someplace.  But by whom? And when? And if
the vols. were not numbered, we'd not even suspect that such a
book ever existed. There are
contracts with printers that indicate in the 16th century the
usual press
run for a book of lute music was about 1250-1500 copies.  And
when you look around for surviving copies, how many are there?
Usually about a half dozen.  More usually only a single copy
survives. Or none as with Gian Maria and Segni. In other words a
book of lute music has one chance in
a thousand of reaching us today.  And the chances are smaller
with manuscripts that originally existed in one copy.  THat would
make the chance of a piece in a manuscript having one chance in a
million of surviving to our age!

And there is a fantasia in the Siena manuscript copied about 1595
that was first published in a corrupt version in Paris in 1529.
No other copy/version is known. That's even a longer
period. And it surely did not derive from a corrupt version. And
there are no other sources for the piece which
surely originated in Italy, perhaps from the pen of Francesco.

|I suppose Mertel must have raided some
| English sources (the very next piece in Mertel is a Fantasia by
| Holborne, also in Hirsch but a tone lower) but it seems
| unlikely that he
| would have had access to Hirsch itself.

<<ajn>>There were probably intermediary sources.   The pieces in
Mertal
are unattributed, but are overwhelmingly by Continental composers
Perrichon, Laurencini, Galilei, M. Newsidler, Francesco, Cato.
The contents are reminiscent of Besard's _*Thesaurus*_ of 1603.
And large numbers of pieces still remain unidentified.
|
| I would value your opinion on another pair of pieces: Recercar
terzo
| from da Crema's 1546 book, and Siena f.4 (no.52 in your
Francesco edition).  There are some curious discrepancies between
| the two versions, though they are clearly both based on the
same
| "original" (by Segni?).

<<ajn>>Which original do you mean? Segni just has a ricercar with
the same openiojg theme. The version publ. in da Crema and
attributed to "Francesco de
milan" is in the HUP edition as Appendix 6.  As such it does not
appear
in the surviving pieces by Segni, and so perhaps we should accept
da Crema's attribution.  The da Crema version has additional
ornamentation, as do the other works.  I think the original was
composed as
SATB or SAT part music, as da Crema indicates on the titlepage in
regard to
Segni, "intabulati & accomodati per sonar sopra il Lautto di M.
Jo. Maria da Crema . . ."

| Talking of Segni, is Slim's edition of Musica Nova still
available?

Apparently it's OOP.

| I would like to acquire a copy, even if most of the Segni
pieces
adapted
| for the lute are not in it, if my reading of Brown is correct.
|

<<ajn>>No. Slim and Brown were close friends and surely kept one 
another
informed.  Slim did a very good job in tracking down lute
versions of Segni's ricercars.  I only found two pieces Colin
missed, and I'll tell you about them a few paragraphs below.
Once again we are dealing with the chance survival of 16th
century music.  Of Segni's publication _*Musica Nova*_ (Venice
1540), only the bass part book survives.  That's it. All gone.
However a
pirated(?) French edition appeared in Lyons with many of the same
pieces (as can be determined from the bass part).  So that is
how Colin put together his edition of Musica Nova.  But only a
few of the Segni works were arranged for lute.  The many lute
arrangements that we do have probably came from a Segni
publication that is entirely lost.  Some time around 1550 Segni
published an edition of some 50 "Recercari, intabulature da
organi et da tocco".  And an edition like that is probably the
source
from which people like da Crema made their lute arrangements.  I
wonder if that volume also included Francesco's works as well.
Because Segni and Francesco were colleagues at the papal court.

Colin missed a Francesco ricercar (No. 86) which appears in Music
Nova (No. XI).  Both sources date from about the same time, so to
whom do we grant priority?  Did Segni arrange a Francesco lute
piece for organ?

I discovered another fun Segni concordance in Domenico
Bianchini's tablature book (Venice 1546).  Two ricercars are by
Segni. (Another one on "Faulte d'Argent" is in the style of
Cavazzoni.) One of the Segni ricercars is in Musica nova but
Colin missed it because the opening is embellished in Bianchini's
lute arrangement.  I was curious about that p[iece because so
much of the music in Bianchini's book is rather primative.  The
work of an untrained amateur.  So what were the finely wrought
ricercars doing there? Segni was first organist at St. Mark's in
Venice before going to Rome and joining Francesco.  And
Bianchini?  He was a master mosaicist and member of a family of
mocaicists who worked in St. Mark's!  When Bianchini was working
high up on the scaffold, Segni might very well be down below
practicing the organ.  I wonder if Bianchini sometimes played his
lute arrangements down to Segni?<g>  A kind of heavenly echo.
The beginnings of cori spezzati?

| Best wishes,
|
| Martin
|
| Arthur Ness wrote:
|
| >Dear Martin,
| >
| >That is an interesting pair of works that you published.  The
| >Hirsch version is the same as a fantasia (or fuga--the titles
are
| >not specific for each piece) in Elias Mertal, _Hortus
Musicalis
| >Novus_ (Strasbourg 1615), No. 79 (pp. 222-3).  Probably the
| >proper
| >title is Fuga.  I have a transcription (App. 4) like yours in
| >parallel systems, and can send it if you are interested.  I do
| >think quite
| >a few of Francesco's works were conceived as ensemble part
music,
| >including several pieces called "fuga." Not necessarily was it
| >by Julio da Modena.
| >
| >Judging from the ornamentation, the Hirsch/Mertel version was
| >second, and an attempt to make the piece canzona-like.
| >
| >Or I'll post the transcriptions to my site.  Let me know.
| >
| >Best regards, Arthur.
| >=====AJN (Boston, Mass.)=====
| >*  Free Download of the Week from Classical Music Library:
| >
| >For this week's free download from Classical Music Library go
to
| >my web page
| >and click on Alexander Street Press link:
| >
| >http://mysite.verizon.net/arthurjness/
| >
| >*Vaughan Williams'_ Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis___*
| >performed by the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra; Christopher
| >Seaman, conductor. More
| >information about this piece is available on our  music blog
| ><http://alexanderstreet.typepad.com/music>.
| >
| >For some free scores, go to:
| >http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/arthurjnesslutescores/
| >===================================
| >
| >----- Original Message ----- 
| >From: "Martin Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >To: "Lute Net" <[email protected]>
| >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:06 AM
| >Subject: [LUTE] New piece of the month
| >
| >
| >| Dear All,
| >|
| >| The new Piece of the Month for March is now available on
| >|
| >| www.luteshop.co.uk/month/pieceofthemonth.htm
| >|
| >| Downloads are available as Fromino, Tab, PDF and MP3.
| >|
| >| I hope your copy of Acrobat reader behaves better than
mine -
| >it seems
| >| to be picking up the wrong file even though I've
double/triple
| >checked
| >| that the links are correct.  Please let me know if there are
| >any other
| >| problems.
| >|
| >| My web host has told me that, due to an upgrade,  there may
be
| >some
| >| disruption to service between 11pm this evening and 5am
| >tommorrow - I
| >| don't imagine this will be a problem for anyone in Europe
but
| >some of
| >| you may be farther-flung.
| >|
| >| Best wishes,
| >|
| >| Martin
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| To get on or off this list see list information at
| >| http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
| >|
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|



Reply via email to