Of course - but in any case, ignore the last which was sent by me in
   error - I meant to press the save draft key whilst I dug out Hurel but
   must have pressed the send (I thought I'd just deleted it)!  The
   correct version of my reply to your query is, as I type this, winging
   its way to you. You'll see it's longer and I've excised the, probably
   contentious, comment about usage of the first course.

   What's your view?

   rgds

   Martyn
   --- On Mon, 22/3/10, Monica Hall <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Monica Hall <[email protected]>
     Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti - copy of relevant page
     To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>
     Cc: "Lutelist" <[email protected]>
     Date: Monday, 22 March, 2010, 15:46

      That's very interesting.   Would the fact that Bartolotti was
   Italian
      make any difference?
      As ever
      Monica
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: [1]Martyn Hodgson
      To: [2]Monica Hall
      Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 3:33 PM
      Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti - copy of relevant page
      Well,
      yle of the only theorbo work with the possible name of our man
   attached
      ('Allemande di Angelo Michieli') seems to me rather more treble and
      bass polarised - somewhat closer to deVisee's theorbo works or those
   of
      late 17th/early 18thC lutenists like Count Losy -  than the more
   French
      lute style (breaking of chords etc) of the third quarter of the
   17thC.
      Interestingly, in this Allemande the first course carries much of
   the
      melody whereas the commoner theorbo pattern is to use inner courses
   (ie
      3 and 4)
        From: Monica Hall <[1][email protected]>
        Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti - copy of relevant page
        To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[2][email protected]>
        Cc: "Lutelist" <[3][email protected]>
        Date: Monday, 22 March, 2010, 14:09
      I don't have a solution to this particular problem but I was
   interested
      in
      something which you said about the style of the pieces suggesting a
      later
      date in the earlier discussion.   To witt...
      "The only thing  that bothers me about these attributions to A. M.
      Bartolotti is the dates: from style alone I would have tended to
   date
      the NB
      17.706 MS to the end of of the 17thC  and the Goess pieces no earler
      than
      the 1670s (but there are a number of scribes) - but Claude Chauvel
      makes a
      decent case for B being dead by 1682 when his Royal Household
      establishment
      books were passed to Launay (of course he may have simply retired
   but
      I'd
      have thought in that case we'd have pension payments recorded). "
      What Chauvel actually says is that the establishment books record
   that
      the
      possessions (les biens in French) of one Miquelange, Italien were
      assigned
      to Launay, not that the establishment books were passed to Launay.
      Under French law the possessions of foreigners who died in France
      became the
      property of the king to dispose as he saw fit.  If this  Miquelange,
      Italien
      is Bartolotti, he was presumably dead by January 1682 and his
   worldly
      goods
      given to Launay.   Bartolotti would still have been alive and active
   in
      the
      1670s but not later.
      What is it about the style of the pieces in the Vienna manuscript
   which
      suggests that they are later that say 1680?
      As ever
      Monica
      Could it be that these two A.M.s  are not the same;  did he have a
   son
      also
      called A M who played the theorbo?  Against such wild speculation is
      that B
      clearly was an adventurous and, indeed, progressive composer so
   perhaps
      the
      mid 17thC is not unreasonable.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[3][4][email protected]>
      To: "Alexander Batov" <[4][5][email protected]>;
   "Vihuela
      Dmth"
      <[5][6][email protected]>; "Lute Dmth"
   <[6][7][email protected]>
      Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:08 AM
      Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Bartolotti - copy of relevant page
      > --0-595003020-1269245312=:61374
      > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
      > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
      >
      >
      > Thank you Alexander - an interesting idea. I've scanned my copy of
      the
      > first page of this 'Preludio' and attach it herewith.
      >
      > You'll see that the same number is put against different
   (tablature)
      bass
      > notes - especially see right at the end of the last line.
      >
      > My own preference is that it indicates a manner of breaking the
      chords -
      > but see the 4th and 5th chords from the end of the last line: a
   three
      > against a 5 note chord - possible of course if one beaks the chord
   in
      an
      > uneven manner (say the two lowest notes and the top three notes as
      three
      > seperate strikes) but........
      >
      > As a very long stop, I've also wondered if it might indicate
   duration
      (eg
      > number of seconds or pulses per chord) written in by a teacher to
      indicate
      > the interpretation of this 'prelude non mesure' ..... but......
      >
      > Martyn
      >
      >
      > -- On Sun, 21/3/10, Alexander Batov
      <[7][8][email protected]>
      > wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: Alexander Batov <[8][9][email protected]>
      > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti
      > To:
      > Cc: "Lutelist" <[9][10][email protected]>
      > Date: Sunday, 21 March, 2010, 17:36
      >
      >
      > OK, here is an idea. In the so called "Swan" manuscript
      (St-Petersburg,
      > the library of the academy of science) some of the lute pieces
   appear
      to
      > be re-adapted to play on baryton, or, indeed, on either. I don't
   have
      a
      > copy of this MS with me at the moment but if the memory serves me
      right (I
      > used to see the original a number of times but that was 25 years
      ago!), a
      > similar sort of numbers are written beneath the bottom tablature
      line,
      > next to the usual bass course letters. What this would mean is
   that
      the
      > person would play from the tablature using the main six strings of
      the
      > baryton, with the left hand thumb plucking the corresponding
   drones
      at the
      > back of the neck. And it's those drone strings that would have to
   be
      > indicated so as to eliminate guess work.
      >
      > What you can do is to check if the same numbers (2 or 3, for
      instance)
      > mean like indicating the same bass note (judging by what's written
   on
      the
      > tablature stave above) or, perhaps, if they are written next to
   the
      same
      > bass course indications (i.e. as for theorbo).
      >
      > Alexander
      >
      > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 Martyn Hodgson wrote:
      >
      > On the subject of Bartolotti's theorbo works, has anyone yet come
   up
      > with an interpretation of the small numbers under the tablature
   stave
      > in the Prelude starting at f. 90v of Wien NB MS 17.706. Altho'
   this
      > piece isn't attributed to B., a later Allemande in a very similar
      > style is. I asked this question a few years ago (in fact 14 Dec
   2005)
      > but there seemed no convincing view of what they meant. I've
   pasted
      my
      > original query below and would be grateful for any insights.
      >
      >
      >
   --------------------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > ' What I think are even more problematical, are the numbers (ie a
   '2'
      > or a '3') appearing under some chords at the bottom of page 90
   (179)
      in
      > the theorbo pieces at the back of Wien MS17.706. At first glance
   one
      > might say these are simply shorthand for bass course tablature,
   but
      the
      > MS uses the usual strokes (ie a /a //a ///a 4 5 6 7) to indicate
      > these; is it the number of times the chord is repeated? - but in
   the
      > context of the particular chord progressions where it appears this
      > makes little sense; is it how the chord is to be broken? but the
      > relevant chords have varying numbers of notes (ranging from three
   to
      5)
      > and he also uses the established ://: sign for arpeggiation; is it
      some
      > LH fingering? - but in the context this again makes no sense.'
      >
      > Martyn
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > To get on or off this list see list information at
      > [10][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --0-595003020-1269245312=:61374
      > Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
      > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
      >
      > <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td
      valign="top"
      > style="font: inherit;"><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>Thank you Alexander - an interesting idea. I've scanned my
   copy
      of
      > the first&nbsp;page of this 'Preludio' and attach it
   herewith.</DIV>
      > <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>You'll see that the same number is put against different
      (tablature)
      > bass notes - especially see right at the end of the last
   line.</DIV>
      > <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>My own preference is that it indicates a manner of breaking
   the
      > chords - but see the 4th and 5th chords from the end of the last
      line: a
      > three against a 5 note chord - possible of course if one beaks the
      chord
      > in an uneven manner (say the two lowest notes and the top three
   notes
      as
      > three seperate strikes) but........</DIV>
      > <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>As a very long stop, I've also wondered if&nbsp;it might
      indicate
      > duration (eg number of seconds or pulses per chord) written in by
   a
      > teacher to indicate the interpretation of this 'prelude non
   mesure'
      > .....&nbsp; but......</DIV>
      > <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>Martyn</DIV>
      > <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      > <DIV>-- On <B>Sun, 21/3/10, Alexander Batov
      > <I>&lt;[11][12][email protected]&gt;</I></B>
      wrote:<BR></DIV>
      > <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid;
      PADDING-LEFT:
      > 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: Alexander Batov
      > &lt;[12][13][email protected]&gt;<BR>Subject:
   [LUTE] Re:
      > Bartolotti<BR>To: <BR>Cc: "Lutelist"
      > &lt;[13][14][email protected]&gt;<BR>Date: Sunday, 21 March,
   2010,
      > 17:36<BR><BR>
      > <DIV class=plainMail>OK, here is an idea. In the so called "Swan"
      > manuscript (St-Petersburg, the library of the academy of science)
      some of
      > the lute pieces appear to be re-adapted to play on baryton, or,
      indeed, on
      > either. I don't have a copy of this MS with me at the moment but
   if
      the
      > memory serves me right (I used to see the original a number of
   times
      but
      > that was 25 years ago!), a similar sort of numbers are written
      beneath the
      > bottom tablature line, next to the usual bass course letters. What
      this
      > would mean is that the person would play from the tablature using
   the
      main
      > six strings of the baryton, with the left hand thumb plucking the
      > corresponding drones at the back of the neck. And it's those drone
      strings
      > that would have to be indicated so as to eliminate guess
      work.<BR><BR>What
      > you can do is to check if the same numbers (2 or 3, for instance)
      mean
      > like indicating the same bass note (judging by what's written on
   the
      > tablature stave above) or,
      > perhaps, if they are written next to the same bass course
   indications
      > (i.e. as for theorbo).<BR><BR>Alexander<BR><BR>On Sat, 20 Mar 2010
      Martyn
      > Hodgson wrote:<BR><BR>On the subject of Bartolotti's theorbo
   works,
      has
      > anyone yet come up<BR>with an interpretation of the small numbers
      under
      > the tablature stave<BR>in the Prelude starting at f. 90v of Wien
   NB
      MS
      > 17.706. Altho' this<BR>piece isn't attributed to B., a later
      Allemande in
      > a very similar<BR>style is. I asked this question a few years ago
   (in
      fact
      > 14 Dec 2005)<BR>but there seemed no convincing view of what they
      meant.
      > I've pasted my<BR>original query below and would be grateful for
   any
      >
      insights.<BR><BR><BR>-----------------------------------------------
   ---
      ------------------<BR><BR>'
      > What I think are even more problematical, are the numbers (ie a
      '2'<BR>or
      > a '3') appearing under some chords at the bottom of page 90 (179)
      > in<BR>the theorbo pieces at the back of Wien MS17.706. At first
      glance
      > one<BR>might say these are simply shorthand for bass course
      tablature, but
      > the<BR>MS uses the usual strokes (ie a /a //a ///a 4 5 6 7) to
      > indicate<BR>these; is it the number of times the chord is
   repeated? -
      but
      > in the<BR>context of the particular chord progressions where it
      appears
      > this<BR>makes little sense; is it how the chord is to be broken?
   but
      > the<BR>relevant chords have varying numbers of notes (ranging from
      three
      > to 5)<BR>and he also uses the established ://: sign for
   arpeggiation;
      is
      > it some<BR>LH fingering? - but in the context this again makes no
      > sense.'<BR><BR>Martyn<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>To get on or off this
   list
      see
      > list information at<BR><A
      >
   href="[14][15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html";
      >
      target=_blank>[15][16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/in
   dex.htm
      l</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --0-595003020-1269245312=:61374--
      > --
      --
   References
      1. mailto:[17][email protected]
      2. mailto:[18][email protected]
      3.
   [19]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   .uk
      4.
   [20]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=alexander.ba...@vihuel
   ademano.com
      5.
   [21]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   du
      6.
   [22]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
      7.
   [23]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=alexander.ba...@vihuel
   ademano.com
      8.
   [24]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=alexander.ba...@vihuel
   ademano.com
      9.
   [25]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     10. [26]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     11.
   [27]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=alexander.ba...@vihuel
   ademano.com
     12.
   [28]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=alexander.ba...@vihuel
   ademano.com
     13.
   [29]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     14. [30]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     15. [31]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   5. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   6. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   7. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   8. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   9. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  10. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  12. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  13. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  14. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.htm
  17. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  18. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  19. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  20. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  21. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  22. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  23. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  24. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  25. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  26. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  27. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  28. 
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  29. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  30. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  31. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to