Very interesting that you'd normally string a mandolino at around
   2.3/2.4 Kg. This question of (low?) tension is precisely what sparked
   the current round of exchanges. I'd suggested a tension of around 2Kg
   might be looked at for mandolino finger style (based on scaled lute
   practice/size) but most responses from players indicated that they
   generally used a tension around double this. Asking for any historical
   evidence for mandolino tensions produced nothing - are you aware of
   anything (even good iconography) which might suggest tensions around
   2/2.5Kg?

   Martyn
   --- On Tue, 1/6/10, Alexander Batov <[email protected]>
   wrote:

     From: Alexander Batov <[email protected]>
     Subject: [LUTE] Re: baroque mandolins etc---not forgetting the
     French mandore
     To:
     Cc: "Lute List" <[email protected]>
     Date: Tuesday, 1 June, 2010, 22:29

   Yes, I would certainly use different stings on single- and
   double-strung instruments. On the single-strung mandore I've currently
   got (SL 33.5cm), the first string is at c. 2.8kg, the rest at c. 2.5 -
   2.7kg (I prefer a slightly higher tension on thicker gut strings, 3rd /
   4th). I don't have a mandolino any more but it would normally be string
   with at a lower tension, c. 2.3 - 2.4 kg per string.
   Alexander
   On 01/06/2010 21:36, Stuart Walsh wrote:
   > Alexander Batov wrote:
   >> Many good points, Stuart. I myself is a long term fan of this this
   little instrument (although not so much nowadays) and have made a
   number of copies of both the mandore and mandolino. I could never
   really see any hard reasons to distinguish them (I'm talking about
   early 17th - mid 18th century time frame). In fact, constructionally
   and in terms of size it is the same instrument and that's the main
   thing! There is also an evidence of a small late 16th century descant
   lute by Venere that was converted to a 6-course mandolino (hardly
   surprising, bearing in mind a suitable body size at hand!). As for the
   stringing, there seemed to be all different sorts of combinations, with
   5- and 6-course instruments being double-strung throughout, or with a
   single first course, not to say with 4, 5 and, occasionally, 6 single
   strings (again, within the above-mentioned period).
   >
   > Very interesting. I'm still puzzling over string tensions. Would you
   use a different set of strings for a single-strung  instrument than a
   double-strung one? Would a single-string instrument need slightly
   thicker strings and higher tension?
   >
   >
   > Stuart
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to