Eh! I didn't write
>> I would vote for 'right hand'. Accenti muti could mean some muting > to prevent everlasting bass strings, although only modern nylon wound > strings suffer from this problem and gut strings not. But I did write Indeed - but are 'accenti muti' perhaps something a little different - > ie with the second of the pair immediately damped - see my email below > (not copied to the general list) My observation was that if he had wished to simply refer to slurred notes why not just write 'accent' - his use of 'accenti muti' might mean something slightly different as I suggested. Just a possibility - no more..... MH --- On Thu, 13/1/11, wikla <[email protected]> wrote: From: wikla <[email protected]> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Agazzari To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]> Cc: "Lute List" <[email protected]>, "Martin Shepherd" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 13 January, 2011, 21:17 Martyn and List On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:20:17 +0000 (GMT), Martyn Hodgson <[1][email protected]> wrote: > Indeed - but are 'accenti muti' perhaps something a little different - > ie with the second of the pair immediately damped - see my email below > (not copied to the general list!) > Do you mean this (it was not easy to find out, what was written by you): > >> I would vote for 'right hand'. Accenti muti could mean some muting > to prevent everlasting bass strings, although only modern nylon wound > strings suffer from this problem and gut strings not. Anyway, to me "accenti muti" do not sound like "dampening the second note". There is so much evidence of the "slurs", "stracini", in the Italian theorbo litterature that I am (nearly) certain that Agazzari writes just this technique by his term "accenti muti". All the best, Arto To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
