Chris,

Interesting that you should bring up rolled chords; there was much discussion on another list several months ago about this YouTube video:

Louis Podesta's "Your Piano Teacher Taught You Wrong"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VPgg3armCI

Gary

Dr. Gary R. Boye
Professor and Music Librarian
Appalachian State University

On 11/16/2012 9:28 AM, Christopher Wilke wrote:
    Martyn,
         The use of rolled chords, like so many things in early music
    performance, has to be assigned to the "inconclusive" category. Lack of
    evidence does not mean lack of practice. For example, the subject is
    rarely mentioned in modern classical guitar methods even though it is a
    ubiquitous. Rolling may just have been one of those things that was
    done without comment.
        Who knows? As always, our primary concern should not be with how
    "informed" we are, but whether or not what we do enhances the music.
    Chris

    Christopher Wilke
    Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
    www.christopherwilke.com
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]>
    To: WALSH STUART <[email protected]>
    Cc: lute <[email protected]>
    Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:58 AM
    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Re/deconstructing Dowland; - and 'rolled' chords
      Regarding 'rolled' chords also raised in this thread, these seem to
    be
      (too?) ubiquitous in this repertoire nowadays and early sources (ie
      pre-17th century) don't generally describe the technique. Only when
    we
      get to the French 17th century lute with separe signs and the like is
      the expectation for such fully upwards arpeggiated chords clear. Even
      Barley, a perhaps unfairly maligned source, indicates a technique for
      playing full 6 note chords or open 5 note chords not too far removed
      from that described by later sources (including Mace and Burwell's
      teacher as well as by continental instructions), in which the first
      finger rakes upwards (ie towards the bass) to cover some of the
    courses
      whilst the second and third fingers strike the others. I would
    suggest
      this was more common than we often suppose nowadays and perhaps led
      onto the later practice of playing the bass and simultaneously raking
      up with the first finger - with the possible added sophistication of
      restriking the highest course or two with the second finger - almost
      the opposite of a modern 'rolled' chord.
      Martyn
      --- On Thu, 15/11/12, WALSH STUART <[1][email protected]> wrote:
        From: WALSH STUART <[2][email protected]>
        Subject: [LUTE] Re: Reconstructing Dowland; deconstructing Dowland
        To: "David van Ooijen" <[3][email protected]>
        Cc: "lute" <[4][email protected]>
        Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 23:01
          Beautiful playing. I wouldn't have known this was a modern
          reconstruction. But I don't know the music well and I haven't
      listened
          to Dowland in a long time and I don't try and play the music.
          But I'm very, very surprised (and intrigued and amused)  that it
      needs
          reconstruction, DIY or otherwise. Two questions:
          a) where does this idea leave all the great performances of
    Dowland
      and
          those CD compilations of the complete works?  Lindberg, North.
      O'Dette,
          Chris Wilson etc. They simply didn't notice any fundamental
    issues
      with
          the music?
          b) is Dowland's music uniquely flawed? (needs extra parts, needs
          cliched florid bits excised, need voice-leading corrected etc).
      Dowland
          is often  posed as the pinnacle of Renaissance  lute music. If
    the
          sources of his music is fundamentally compromised, where does
    that
          leave all the other lute music of the Renaissance? Does it all
    need
      a
          bit of modern polishing into shape too?
          (and how is a modern person somehow seeing through the sources to
      what
          Dowland would have wanted beyond the abundant evidence of what
      people
          at the time physically recorded in the tablatures?)
          Stuart
          On 15 November 2012 22:07, David van Ooijen
          <[1][1][5][email protected]> wrote:
          On 15 November 2012 22:12, WALSH STUART
    <[2][2][6][email protected]>
          wrote:
          >    Well, isn't anyone other than Dan going to reply to this? I
    was
          >    expecting a huge response!
            My (two but) latest CD is a response: two 'new' Dowland solos
    `a
      la
            dt,
            albeit reconstructed and played by DvO. ;-)
            In other words: dt is right, DIY-Dowland is the way to go!
            David
            I even uploaded both arrangements to YouTube:
            [3][3][7]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
            [4][4][8]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
            --
            *******************************
            David van Ooijen
            [5][5][9][email protected]
            [6]www.davidvanooijen.nl
            *******************************
          To get on or off this list see list information at
          [7][6][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
          --
      References
          1. mailto:[7][11][email protected]
          2. mailto:[8][12][email protected]
          3. [9][13]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
          4. [10][14]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
          5. mailto:[11][15][email protected]
          6. [12][16]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
          7. [13][17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      --
    References
      1.
    [18]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
    l.com
      2.
    [19]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
      3. [20]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
      4. [21]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
      5.
    [22]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
    l.com
      6. [23]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      7.
    [24]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
    l.com
      8.
    [25]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
      9. [26]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
      10. [27]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
      11.
    [28]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
    l.com
      12. [29]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
      13. [30]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

    --

References

    1. mailto:[email protected]
    2. mailto:[email protected]
    3. mailto:[email protected]
    4. mailto:[email protected]
    5. mailto:[email protected]
    6. mailto:[email protected]
    7. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
    8. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
    9. mailto:[email protected]
   10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   11. mailto:[email protected]
   12. mailto:[email protected]
   13. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
   14. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
   15. mailto:[email protected]
   16. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   18. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
   19. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   20. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
   21. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
   22. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
   23. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   24. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
   25. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   26. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
   27. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
   28. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
   29. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   30. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to