Yikes!  How do professional lute makers manage to sleep at night, with
   their products ready to go 'pop' at any moment?

   Bill
   From: David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk>
   To: William Samson <willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>
   Cc: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>; Lute builder Dmth
   <lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013, 16:39
   Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Further to: Bar end supports on lutes
   Yes, as far as I have observed no lutes were made using support blocks,
   however obvious it would be to give strength. In fact one of the
   commonest problems with amateur made instruments is the tendency to
   make things too strong. It is a maxim to bear in mind that lutes sound
   best when right on the point of collapse! Trembling with fear as it
   were!
   I do remember many years ago asking Friedmann Hellwig specifically
   about whether he thought bar ends were glued to the ribs and he said
   quite clearly that he thought not. Maybe accidental glue in the joint
   there, but nothing deliberate he said. He has probably examined  more
   original lutes than anyone, so I'm inclined to take him seriously. But
   of course this is not to deny Martyn's observation of the Stautinger
   mandora, different makers probably had different practices, even then.
   Best wishes,
   David
   At 15:32 +0000 7/2/13, William Samson wrote:
   >    Dear Martyn,
   >
   >    What you say makes perfect sense.  I will continue to follow the
   >    example set by the old ones.
   >
   >    Kind regards,
   >
   >    Bill
   >    From: Martyn Hodgson <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   >    To: Lute builder Dmth <[2]lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >    Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013, 14:46
   >    Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Further to: Bar end supports on lutes
   >      Further to the recent mailings about using supports to the bar
   ends
   >    of
   >      lutes (as commonly found on guitars) to avoid then becoming
   loose,
   >      there were few responses and the gist seemed to bit that it was
   a
   >    good
   >      idea and unlikely to injure the instrument's tone.
   >      This may be the case, but I'd like to insert a note of caution:
   as
   >    far
   >      as I'm aware no old lute has such bar end supports so we need to
   be
   >      very careful before considering their general modern use.
   Perhaps
   >    the
   >      slight angle between the rib and belly - a little less than a
   right
   >      angle - provides sufficient end support if the bars are fitted
   >      precisely to the rib and at the exact same angle (not possible
   on the
   >      guitar which is a right angle). And, of course, the vast
   majority of
   >      lute makers did not seem to make guitars - and vice-versa (few
   >      exceptions such as Tielke of course and a some workshops) .
   >        One other factor which provides more secure bar end fixing
   also
   >    occurs
   >      to me: Mace speaks of a method of sticking on the belly in one
   >      operation (and of ensuring the bar ends are very well applied
   with
   >      glue). It's a procedure I now usually follow and, tho' it can be
   a
   >    bit
   >      nerve-wracking, the capability of animal glue to be readily
   remelted
   >      in-situ allows post fixing adjustments to be easily made (and
   indeed
   >      Mace mentions this). If one makes a pig's ear of the whole
   business
   >    one
   >      can remove again, clean up and try again next day.  It occurs to
   me
   >      that the (modern?) method of sticking on a lute belly by working
   >    slowly
   >      round trying to get glue into the join is fine - except when one
   >    comes
   >      to the bar end where it can be difficult to ensure one has
   worked in
   >      sufficient glue - in short the bar end may be starved.
   >      The latest original historic lute I've been able to examine
   inside in
   >      detail is a 1773 instrument by Stautinger which exhibits all
   lute
   >      construction features and has no bar end supports. Altho an
   internal
   >      repair had taken place to the back which had suffered a serious
   dent,
   >      access had been made by the rose being cut out (and crudely
   replaced
   >      after) rather than the belly being removed;  the original belly
   >      fixing/gluing was still (I believe) in place - and the external
   >    wooden
   >      liner (as commonly found on 18th century lutes) seemed wholly
   >      undisturbed. All the bars were still glued securely to the sides
   >    (with
   >      quite a bit of squeeze out evident on a few too).
   >      In short, if the bar ends are closely fitted to the angled ribs
   and
   >      sufficient glue is put onto the ends I think there is no need to
   >      consider additional supports like those being suggested. But I
   >      understand very high humidity, in the US especially, may be a
   >      contributory factor to bar end failure with which we here do not
   have
   >      to cope......
   >      MH
   >      --
   >    To get on or off this list see list information at
   >    [1][3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >    --
   >
   > References
   >
   >    1. [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   -- The Smokehouse,
   6 Whitwell Road,
   Norwich,  NR1 4HB      England.
   Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
   Website: [5]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/

   --

References

   1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/

Reply via email to