Thank you for posting these. I enjoyed listening to both of them.
I am not sure that there is any point in people saying which they prefer
because personal tastes differ today and probably did in the 17th century.
De gustibus non disputandum.
I will venture to say that the passage work and the descending bass line
seemed clearer with the re-entrant tuning and that the low bass strings in
the other version sounded muddy and muffled. Foscarini looked puzzled by
both of them.
But that may well be due to the recording - not to mention my equipment.
All the best
Monica
----- Original Message -----
From: "dominic robillard" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 10:26 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Juxtaposition
Hello Luters,
Thanks for being so informative on a daily basis. Here is what
Marionas sounds like in reentrant and non-reentrant from Sanz. Same
tuning, same temperament, same fingering, all strung out on gut. My
extended version.
Reentrant
[1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_uTHGiNQ10&featureAe-overview&list=U
Utc7YBbamzi74FMleVtceaA
Basses
[2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y78QfsZcgvA&list=UUtc7YBbamzi74FMleVt
ceaA
Dominic
--
References
Visible links
1.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_uTHGiNQ10&feature%C3%84-overview&list=UUtc7YBbamzi74FMleVtceaA
2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y78QfsZcgvA&list=UUtc7YBbamzi74FMleVtceaA
Hidden links:
4.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y78QfsZcgvA&list=UUtc7YBbamzi74FMleVtceaA
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
