Segovia was not incompetent, he was simply unmusical. He wasn't alone in that, among the stars of his day. Pablo Casals also comes to mind, and not a few violinists.
RT



On 12/18/2013 2:10 PM, Jarosław Lipski wrote:
Hi,

The Segovia film is nice in its own way, it was probably interesting for at 
least a part of the audience at the time it was recorded,
sounds completely outdated and boring for most people today,

It's fine with me if you don't find it interesting. It's just a personal taste 
(for many his playing is still very attractive - see comments under his 
videos).  I've sent this link only to address some posts that suggested 
Segovia's incompetence as a player.

and may be rediscovered in the future for some reason we would never even think 
of.
Is it somehow related to the lute?
Bream played something thought to be a lute in his own time, so he may be 
discussed here?
Had Segovia anything to do with the lute besides the repertoire? And if it is 
the repertoire, may we include Andre Rieu here? He also plays some of the most 
extended lute repertoire…
No, but I didn't start this thread. The subject says: " I just noticed we got so far 
away from the [LUTE]-forum" No, but seriously, people were discussing Segovia's 
attitude towards art and teaching (see below), so this is my reply to that part of the 
thread.
Sorry if you find any problem in it.
And I'm not trying to defend Segovia (I'm wholeheartedly with Michael),  but 
I'm rather trying to find a reasons (context) of Segovia's reactions. I've seen 
this kind of attitude before, so probably this is why I'm not surprised so much.

Regards

Jaroslaw


Em 18.12.2013, às 14:00, Jarosław Lipski <jaroslawlip...@wp.pl> escreveu:

Segovia could have been polite and gentle providing that a student followed his 
remarks, fingerings etc. This is nothing extraordinary in music, and there are 
similar reported cases from the past centuries . Some big Maestros were known 
for bullying un-subjugated pupils. (Bach was known for bullying  kids from his 
choir). This is not a good excuse obviously, especially in our modern world, 
however it gives me a thought how both performance practice and teaching 
evolved.
BTW for those of you who doubt Segovia's competence as a guitarist there is a 
short, live video from 50's (Torroba's Sonatina in particular). 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjRLpE_TzdA

Enjoy

Jaroslaw


Wiadomość napisana przez gary w dniu 18 gru 2013, o godz. 04:08:

How does one go about preventing the tastes of one person from "shaping the tastes 
of an art"? Van Gogh couldn't sell a painting to save his life during his own time 
because of the prevailing taste of his era. Popularity is a factor in determining an 
era's tastes in art. It seems unfair to fault Segovia for accepting his popularity and 
using it to further his own taste. I'm sure from Segovia's point of view in promoting his 
own tastes he was protecting the integrity of the guitar and the music.

Gary


On 2013-12-17 13:13, Braig, Eugene wrote:
. . . Not to mention a huge body of dedicated baroque- and
romantic-era repertoire for guitar that was forgotten for generations
because Segovia didn't like it and instead opted to create a body of
repertoire through transcription.  I don't think Segovia can be blamed
for his tremendous popularity, but there is a danger in allowing the
tastes of one person shape the state of an art.
Respectfully,
Eugene

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html








Reply via email to