I'd love to see a photo of that. 


> On Nov 18, 2014, at 10:49 AM, John Mardinly <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>   Dan;
> 
>       Can you elaborate?
> 
>   A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E.
> 
>   Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer
> 
>   EMail: [1][email protected]
> 
>   Cell: [2]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs)
> 
>   Titan Lab: [3]480-727-5651
> 
>   NION UltraSTEM Lab: [4]480-727-5652
> 
>   JEOL ARM 200 Lab: [5]480-727-5653
> 
>   2010F Lab: [6]480-727-5654
> 
>   Office: [7]480-965-7946
> 
>   John Cowley Center for HREM, LE-CSSS
> 
>   B134B Bateman Physical Sciences Building
> 
>   Arizona State University
> 
>   [8]PO Box 871704
> 
>   [9]Tempe, AZ 85287-1704
> 
>   On Nov 11, 2014, at 4:33 PM, "Dan Winheld" <[10][email protected]>
>   wrote:
> 
>   Squirrels can't hold on to them- boxer shorts can't contain them- but
>   lutenists LOVE them.... SLIPPERY NUTS!
>   On 11/11/2014 8:14 AM, Sean Smith wrote:
> 
>     Hi Herbert,
> 
>     I have never heard of this problem on the 4th course with gut so
>     I'll assume you use metal wound strings. I'll admit it's an
>     assumption that could be false or you may be using a plastic of some
>     sort. It would be helpful to know in any event.
> 
>     Using a string made up of coils that are harder than the nut
>     material could well have printed those coils on the groove of the
>     nut, especially if you have used a high tension or the nut is old or
>     of soft material or it has sat a long time at tension. The nut we
>     use for gut wasn't imagined to work this way with metal coils. The
>     lute was designed with a bone/ivory/wood nut that is harder than the
>     gut string. The gut spreads out to the smooth nut surface under
>     tension and at no point does it "dig in" (I'm not sure a plastic
>     string spreads like this but I doubt it). Using gut (and a little
>     beeswax now and then) I have no trouble adjusting the pitch -
>     assuming the strings and frets are true.
> 
>     Citterns, orpharions and bandoras that use metal strings have the
>     lesser bend like the guitars you mention. It solves the bend/tension
>     problem for the materials given.
> 
>     If you're inclined to use modern stringing and don't mind modern
>     workarounds, you might consider a modern angle to accomodate it. Or
>     maybe a steel nut ... and WD-40. It would be less colorful than 15
>     different loops of yarn though.
> 
>     Sean
> 
>     On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Herbert Ward wrote:
> 
>     The bent-back pegbox means that a lute
> 
>     has 7.5 times as much friction at
> 
>     the nut as a guitar, taking angles of
> 
>     10 degrees for the guitar and 80 for the
> 
>     lute.
> 
>     For the strings attached to the farthest
> 
>     pegs (say, the fourth course) this friction
> 
>     causes trouble because the strings stick
> 
>     at the nut during tuning.
> 
>     Graphite lubrication never helped me much.
> 
>     Nor did tugging at the string, though it
> 
>     seems this should work when tuning downward.
> 
>     To fix the problem, I tied a loop of ordinary
> 
>     household twine around the string in the peg-
> 
>     box, and MOVED IT AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO
> 
>     THE NUT.
> 
>     Now I adjust the peg, and
> 
>     then give a momentary tug on the loop.  The
> 
>     tug pulls the string almost completely away
> 
>     from the nut, and thus equalizes the tension
> 
>     along the entire length of the string.
> 
>     In response, the pitch immediately and
> 
>     reliably reflects the
> 
>     slightest movement of the peg (in either
> 
>     direction), as with a harp.
> 
>     A side-benefit is that the peg stays pushed
> 
>     in longer, since the peg is turned so little.
> 
>     Of course, if you put loops on
> 
>     multiple strings, then you have a mass of loops
> 
>     from which it is difficult to find the one you
> 
>     need.  I've ordered a skein of multi-colored
> 
>     knitting yarn to see whether color-coding will
> 
>     reduce this problem.
> 
>     To get on or off this list see list information at
> 
>     [11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>   --
> 
> References
> 
>   1. mailto:[email protected]
>   2. tel:408-921-3253
>   3. tel:480-727-5651
>   4. tel:480-727-5652
>   5. tel:480-727-5653
>   6. tel:480-727-5654
>   7. tel:480-965-7946
>   8. x-apple-data-detectors://6/
>   9. x-apple-data-detectors://6/
>  10. mailto:[email protected]
>  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 


Reply via email to