Sorry I didn't make myself clear.

When thinking about English theorbo, I was thinking about the viability of the lowest basses (at say 130cm).  On a typical swan-neck lute, the lowest course would be tuned to AA at a likely pitch of around a'=392 and be perhaps 99cm long, so this might be a better comparison.  This comparison suggests that the 130cm bass on the theorbo would be fine.

The other issue is whether the 7th course octave is too thin to be viable (I can imagine a diameter of about .70mm for the low octave, but that implies .35mm for the high octave).  I've temporarily lost my string calculator, but Martyn Hodgson's estimate of .34mm seems reasonable.  But .34mm is at least 20% thinner than the smallest diameter that we think the Old Ones could have made (we could be wrong about this, but even if such a string could be made it is hard to imagine it being any use for anything, as Matthew says).

So it seems to me that Magnus' potential problem is how to string the upper octaves of the 7th (and also probably 8th) course.

Martin

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to