It seems that Arto's gag is in fact very true.

https://soundcloud.com/tristan-von-neumann/js-bach-bwv-190-chorus-singet-dem-hernn-ein-neues-lied-raga-kamod

Why did Bach collect so much "Early Music"? Here's my answer - he was looking for Indian Music.

I guess the Thomas Cantors had a collection, as did Sweelinck, Gabrieli, Monteverdi, and Schütz. Frescobaldi and Kapsberger in Rome.

Vincenzo Galilei Contrapunto 2 BM is also Raga Kamod.
Try playing it to a raga recording of your choice.

This encompasses the Baroque, and assuming this was the age of discovering Raga it maybe not far fetched to call it "Indian Style".
After that, music moved on with focus on tonality.
But good counterpoint is still remembered.

New concepts in this age 15??-1700:
"Style" - why invent the word, if there's nothing to discriminate. Why the sudden rise of "Concerto" and "Stylus Phantasticus"?

If anyone takes this seriously, go ahead. If there's nothing to it, You at least discover nice possibilities for intercultural music making.

:)



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to