Thanks, Thomas, for this advice. But I didn’t made a transcription from the 
C-major sonata for lute and viola. I made the reconstruction of the three 
sonatas which are transmitted in tablature - but be careful: D-B Rust 53 was 
changed probably by Wilhelm Rust. Read below:

B) On Friedrich Wilhelm Rust

The lute music of Friedrich Wilhelm Rust is preserved in two tablature sources: 
D-B Rust 53 and PL-Kj 40150 (formerly Berlin, intermediately at the storage 
site Fürstenstein). Rust 53 is characterized by a completely un-lutenistic 
style, and there are even unplayable passages in the music. A comparison with 
the lute parts of the Sonatas I and II, which are contained in PL-Kj 40150, was 
only possible after the manuscripts stored in Fürstenstein in WW2 had become 
available again in c. 1987. It then showed that the Sonatas in Rust 53 had 
undergone far-reaching arrangements introducing additional voices into the 
music which were written directly into the tablature. In 1988 Andreas Schlegel 
visited the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek in what was then still East Berlin (GDR) 
and examined the source in in detail, uncovering the original layer of the 
tablature. This allowed to see that the versions in PL-Kj 40150 were almost 
identical with the primary layers in Rust 53. The third Sonata!
  which only survives in the arrangement in Rust 53 could now be reconstructed 
in its original form by applying the criteria arrived at while comparing the 
other compositions with the versions in PL-Kj 40150.

The arrangements of the music in Rust 53 are probably connected to the “Rust 
affair”: Wilhelm Rust, Cantor at St Thomas in Leipzig and grandson of Friedrich 
Wilhelm Rust, wanted to let his grandfather appear as an predecessor of 
Beethoven. To that end he published editions of his grandfather’s compositions, 
which he had arranged and equipped with additional parts in the style of 
romantic music. As Rust was also the author of an article on lute tablature in 
an encyclopaedia, he might have felt the need to cover up the the differences 
between the original tablature and his edition of his grandfather’s sonatas. 
For a new edition and a recording of the music (see below), the original form 
of the violin part also had to be reconstructed, as Rust had arranged it too. 
The new edition consists therefore of music in a reconstructed original version 
and can thus not be understoot as a critical edition. Earlier editions based on 
Rust 53 (for example that of Neemann) should not !
 be used anymore!

Zur Neuausgabe der Sonaten für Laute und obligate Violine/Flöte von Friedrich 
Wilhelm Rust, in: Gitarre & Laute 6 (1989), pp. 41–47 (On the new edition of 
Friedrich Wilhelm Rust’s Sonatas for Lute and Violin/Flute obbligato)

Friedrich Wilhelm Rust: Drei Sonaten für Laute und obligate Violine/Flöte, 
Menziken (The Lute Corner) 1998 (Three Sonatas for Lute and Violin/Flute 
obbligato)

CD Friedrich Wilhelm Rust (1739–1769) & Bernhard Joachim Hagen (ca. 1720–1787): 
Sonaten für Laute und obligate Violine (Sonatas for Lute and Violin obbligato), 
together with Myrtha Indermaur (Violin), Menziken (The Lute Corner) 2006

The C-major sonata for lute & viola is indeed a riddle. Like Alain I’m 
convinced that it’s not written for a lute in d-minor-tuning because of some 
places which are not playable. But I worked on this sonata 30 years ago…


All the best

Andreas

> Am 13.02.2019 um 19:52 schrieb Thomas Schall <[email protected]>:
> 
> There is already a very well done adaption for the lute available (by Andi 
> Schlegel)
> https://lutecorner.ch/
> 
> Bst wishes
> Thomas
> 
> Am 13.02.2019 um 18:43 schrieb Alain Veylit:
>> eing one octave down from what one might expect. Without that transposition, 
>> none of the lute's diapasons would be used... Transposing means some tricky 
>> arpeggios for the thumb 
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Andreas Schlegel
Eckstr. 6
CH-5737 Menziken
Festnetz +41 (0)62 771 47 07
Mobile +41 (0)78 646 87 63
[email protected]





Reply via email to