Dowland is quite late

   -------- Messaggio originale --------
   Da: [email protected]
   Data: 27/07/19 17:32 (GMT+01:00)
   A: Rainer <[email protected]>
   Cc: Lute net <[email protected]>
   Oggetto: [LUTE] Re: Test 9od temperament)

   F# on the 4th course shows up quite a lot in Dowland.
   RT
   ====
   http://turovsky.org
   Feci quod potui. Faciant meliora potentes.
   > On Jul 27, 2019, at 7:09 AM, Rainer <[email protected]>
   wrote:
   >
   >> On 26.07.2019 21:53, tribioli wrote:
   >>    Everything you need about fret positions is written in David van
   Oojien
   >>    page about temperaments. I use the 1/6 comma (pythagorean) with
   the
   >>    first fret to the A flat position (for a G first string). That
   gives a
   >>    very wrong F sharp on the IV course (it is a G flat indeed) but
   old
   >>    music does show D major chord with the F sharp to the IV course
   really
   >>    really seldom (that's another thing that seems to show they used
   some
   >>    sort of temperament)
   >
   >
   > Excellent! Facts - some people have serious problems with facts.
   >
   >> on 15.05.2018 (obviously before the football World Cup) I wrote:
   >>
   >> Another argument, I have not seen here, yet.
   >> In unequal [must be equal] temperament all octaves are pure.
   >> In 1/6 meantone the octave 2e, 4b is not pure at all.
   >> There is a piece by de Rippe where he uses 2e and 5g instead.
   >> I have run a regular expression search (the computer gurus will
   know) on all my tab files (to scan Fronimo files is impossible, the
   format is binary):
   >> the octave 2d, 4a occurs 805 times.
   >> The octave2e, 4b occurs 0 [yes zero] times.
   >> I think this is a rather convincing argument, is it not?
   >> Rainer
   >> The regular expression is not very sophisticated since it does not
   properly handle ornaments. But 805:0 is even better than Germany's 7:1
   :)
   >
   > Rainer
   >
   >
   >
   > To get on or off this list see list information at
   > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to