Groovy sometimes; nutty others--and only a distant bridge to unite
   them.
   My understanding is that a depth of only half the diameter of the
   string is necessary with radius only slightly larger than the string. I
   prefer a little deeper on the chanterelle of my ren. guitar since it
   loves to pop out but then I get into issues clearing my first fret if
   it's too deep.
   s

   On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 2:04 PM Robert Purrenhage
   <[1][email protected]> wrote:

        This groovy discussion causes me to ponder:
        Should the string grooves at the nut be the full width of the
     string,
        or should they be only as deep and wide as required to hold the
     string
        in position - prevent it from sliding laterally?
        Similarly how deep / wide should the grooves on a Viola da Gamba
     bridge
        be?
        What do the builders on the list have to say?
        Many thanks,
        Bob Purrenhage
        On Thursday, November 28, 2019, 10:27:11 AM EST, Leonard Williams
        <[2][email protected]> wrote:
              Something I had not thought of--width of groove.   Depth
     should
        not
          be a problem; in fact, near the nut the upper surface of the
     octave
          should be lower than the bass. BUT--I had not considered
     looseness
          across the groove.   I'll look into that.
              Thanks for the tip!
          Regards,
          Leonard
          -----Original Message-----
          From: Anthony Hind <[1][3][email protected]>
          To: Leonard Williams <[2][4][email protected]>; daillie
          <[3][5][email protected]>
          Cc: lute <[4][6][email protected]>
          Sent: Thu, Nov 28, 2019 3:32 am
          Subject: Re : [LUTE] Re: Unison C string on 8c lutes
          Could it perhaps be   Leonard, that the grooves at your nut at
     5C was
          set up for your thicker unisson strings. Something similar
     happened
        to
          me on my 11C lute, when I replaced Venice twine unissons on F4
     with
          equivalent thinner loaded strings. I heard a definite rattle. I
     put
        the
          Venices back and the problem went away.
          However later on my 3A unisson HT gut strings a   similar
     rattle
          appeared, I hadn't changed the diameter, but perhaps some wear
     had
          slightly widened the groove or the neck moved a little. I could
     have
          changed to slightly thicker strings, but a lute maker friend
     said he
          could lightly fill and raise the nut's groove with dentist's
     dentine.
          This did the trick, so this solution for changing to octaves
     could
          possibly work for you.
          On my 7C lute, on 5C, I have Venice twine unissons and like
     yourself,
        I
          have been thinking of moving to 1.00 Venice bass and 0.52HT
     octave,
        but
          I fear a similar problem will occur as the lute originally was
     set up
          for the unisons so with a wider 1.00mm groove
          Also, I imagine perhaps wrongly, that a 0,52 Ht gut string will
     last
        a
          lot less than a 1.00 Venice unisson.
          Am I wrong about that?
          Best wishes
          Anthony
          [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
          Le mercredi, novembre 27, 2019, 8:33 PM, Leonard Williams
          <[5][7][email protected]> a à ©crit :
                I, too have had issues with octaves on the 5th course of
     my 8
            course lute.   I tried it several years ago, using an octave
     half
        the
            diameter of the bass (all in gut).   But, whereas the octave
     g on
        6th
            blended well with its bass, the octave c stood out, sounding
        jangly,
            almost as though I had a metal string on there.   Perhaps it
     was
        poor
            (thumb-in in this case) technique?   At any rate, I switched
     back to
            unison.
                I'm trying octaves again as a result of this discussion,
     same
            stringing.   One thing I paid careful attention to was the
     height of
          the
            octave: it stood a mere half millimeter above the bass at the
        bridge,
            but enough that I was striking the pair of strings unevenly,
     with
        the
            octave ringing out quite plainly.   I adjusted the bridge
     knot, what
            little I could, and the sound improved somewhat.   Perhaps
     further
          work
            with RH technique will further improve the sound.   Or--any
     other
            suggestions??
            Regards to all, and Happy (US) Thanksgiving!
            Leonard Williams
          --
        References
          1. [6][8]https://yho.com/footer0
        To get on or off this list see list information at
        [7][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        --
     References
        1. mailto:[10][email protected]
        2. mailto:[11][email protected]
        3. mailto:[12][email protected]
        4. mailto:[13][email protected]
        5. mailto:[14][email protected]
        6. [15]https://yho.com/footer0
        7. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. https://yho.com/footer0
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. mailto:[email protected]
  14. mailto:[email protected]
  15. https://yho.com/footer0
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to