On Tue, 14 May 2013, James Harper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not necessarily Linux related, but I just got off the phone with a certain
> large computer manufacture trying to resolve a failed harddisk on a 3
> month old computer, and they claim that installing an alternate OS has
> voided the warranty. In this case the computer shipped with Win7 and the
> "alternate OS" was XP, but I find the claim ludicrous as I install Linux
> on all sorts of PC's and the warranty callcenter has never skipped a beat
> as long as I can demonstrate the fault in an obvious way. This particular
> computer is a different brand though...
> 
> What's my best avenue to force the issue? Or are they within their rights
> to say that I have voided my warranty?

Naming the company on Whirlpool has been reported to be a good way of getting 
action.

Any decent company won't have any such requirements.  It was always IBM's 
procedure when taking a Thinkpad for warranty repair to accept it without a 
hard drive installed.  Until Lenovo took over Thinkpads were always designed 
to have the hard drive removable without tools and a repair without disk was 
the best way to keep data secure.

The only requirement should be that the fault in question can be demonstrated.  
For a failed disk there shouldn't even be a requirement that it be installed 
in the computer, it's designed that disks can be replaced so you should be 
able to just bring it in.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to