On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 07:38:15 AM Robin Humble via luv-main wrote: > I suspect if slurm mounted the cgroup as cpu,cpuacct then it would > work. but it's because it's trying just cpuacct that it's failing. > that's the sort of behaviour I've seen before. > > the OS appears to bind mount them if they're the same.
Bingo! You are a star sir. :-) [root@spartan001 ~]# mount -v -t cgroup -o cpuacct none /cgroup/cpuacct mount: none is already mounted or /cgroup/cpuacct busy [root@spartan001 ~]# mount -v -t cgroup -o cpu,cpuacct none /cgroup/cpuacct mount: none mounted on /cgroup/cpuacct. > you have the slurm source - care to hack it and give that a go? I suspect I'll just open a bug with SchedMD tomorrow and let them fix that, I've got my hands with my other work full until next year now. > torque 6's cgroup code uses cpu,cpuacct which I presume is in order to > play nicely with rhel7. Yeah, sounds like it.. Thanks Robin! :-) -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
