On Saturday, 12 January 2019 5:04:17 PM AEDT Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> I'd forgotten that screen could even do that.  It's been years since I even
> used zmodem, possibly decades.
> 
> Seems you're not the first to miss it:
 
> If you're going to send a patch, I'd suggest making two generic features
> rather than hard-coding support for zmodem.
> 
> 1. Add an ability to allow tmux to run a program and pipe the output into
> the terminal. e.g. run "rz" inside the terminal and then have tmux run "sz
> filename" to upload a file. This would have many other uses, like running
> "vi" in the terminal and typing "i" or "o" in vi, then having tmux run "cat
> filename".

That is appealing.

> 2. Add an ability to pipe all input from the terminal into a command until
> that command terminates. e.g. run "sz filename" in the terminal and then
> have "tmux" run "rz".
> 
> For programs like rz that are able to detect the end of their input, this
> isn't terribly complicated, but it would be much more complicated for
> programs that just keep on hoovering up stdin until stdin closes - e.g.
> "cat filename" inside the terminal while tmux runs "xsel -i". Another tmux
> command to manually close the input to the running external program would
> be clumsy but workable.
> 
> 
> 3. An obvious third feature would be programmable triggers to run commands.
> e.g. if tmux sees a particular sequence of characters, then run a particular
> program. e.g. "**B00000000000000" could trigger running "rz".  I expect
> that this would probably be quite difficult, and would probably have a
> noticable impact on tmux's performance.

I expect that in the common case of running screen/tmux on the same system as 
an X term the X display would use more CPU time anyway.

I just did a quick test of running top while doing a fairly verbose compile 
with screen and couldn't see screen in top output.  I did see konsole (the KDE 
X-term) taking up to 18% CPU time.

I think there's plenty of scope to have a program like screen or tmux do 
pattern matching on output without comparing to the CPU use of konsole.

I anticipate that someone might be about to say "but konsole sucks it uses too 
much CPU time".  However konsole generally works well enough for me and many 
other people.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/



_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to